Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Intel\s+NUC\,\s+anyone\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Intel\s+NUC\,\s+anyone\?\s*$/: 46 ]

Total 46 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [RTTY] Intel NUC, anyone? (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>; Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2017 16:40:27 -0400; The microHAM "keyer" interfaces (not USB Interface II and III) contain a microprocesor with a UART. The UART is used for FSK with the baud clock programmed for the required baud rate. microHAM goes; /archives//html/RTTY/2017-10/msg00084.html (10,180 bytes)
22. Re: [RTTY] Intel NUC, anyone? (score: 1): Author: iain macdonnell - N6ML <ar@dseven.org>; Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2017 15:21:22 -0700; That's kindof a weak argument. Sending CW with a straight-key is a skill (some would say an art). There's no special (operating) skill involved in FSK vs. AFSK. The usual argument for FSK is that you; /archives//html/RTTY/2017-10/msg00085.html (9,352 bytes)
23. Re: [RTTY] Intel NUC, anyone? (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>; Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2017 18:59:29 -0400; Another is that some rigs have transmit filters that are only usable in FSK mode Actually, that is receive filters. Nearly all of the older Kenwood, Icom and Yaesu rigs limited the narrow filter to "; /archives//html/RTTY/2017-10/msg00086.html (11,081 bytes)
24. Re: [RTTY] Intel NUC, anyone? (score: 1): Author: "Jim W7RY" <jimw7ry@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2017 08:13:09 -0500; Agreed Joe! The Icom IC7300 is like this. I wish radio manufactures would allow AFSK when in RTTY mode with a simple menu change. There are ways to clean up an AFSK signal... But then again.... You'r; /archives//html/RTTY/2017-10/msg00087.html (11,925 bytes)
25. Re: [RTTY] Intel NUC, anyone? (score: 1): Author: "David G3YYD" <g3yyd@btinternet.com>; Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2017 09:16:20 -0500; Is that a learning moment that says: Don't buy an ICOM? 73 David G3YYD Agreed Joe! The Icom IC7300 is like this. I wish radio manufactures would allow AFSK when in RTTY mode with a simple menu change; /archives//html/RTTY/2017-10/msg00088.html (12,345 bytes)
26. Re: [RTTY] Intel NUC, anyone? (score: 1): Author: "Jim W7RY" <jimw7ry@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2017 08:23:55 -0500; No... But it is a HINT for radio and software manufactures.... I'll have to look at my Kenwood TS-590SG to see if it's the same as the Icom. It's not interfaced with N1MM. It's on my test bench. 73 J; /archives//html/RTTY/2017-10/msg00089.html (13,477 bytes)
27. Re: [RTTY] Intel NUC, anyone? (score: 1): Author: Alex <alex@kr1st.com>; Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2017 10:17:07 -0400; Hi Peter, Have you looked into TinyFSK? http://www.frontiernet.net/~aflowers/tinyfsk/ I was looking into doing something similar as you with either a small form factor PC, cheap laptop or some other; /archives//html/RTTY/2017-10/msg00090.html (9,129 bytes)
28. Re: [RTTY] Intel NUC, anyone? (score: 1): Author: "Jim McDonald" <jim@n7us.net>; Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2017 09:42:56 -0500; Would an Edgeport USB-to-serial adaptor work? 73, Jim N7US --Original Message-- Hi Peter, Have you looked into TinyFSK? http://www.frontiernet.net/~aflowers/tinyfsk/ I was looking into doing somethin; /archives//html/RTTY/2017-10/msg00091.html (8,849 bytes)
29. Re: [RTTY] Intel NUC, anyone? (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>; Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2017 10:44:21 -0400; I'll have to look at my Kenwood TS-590SG to see if it's the same as the Icom. It is not. The new Kenwood (TS-590, TS-990 at least), Yaesu (since FT-2000) and Elecraft (K2, K3, K3s, etc.) all permit u; /archives//html/RTTY/2017-10/msg00092.html (14,877 bytes)
30. Re: [RTTY] Intel NUC, anyone? (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>; Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2017 10:47:41 -0400; True. However, the interfaces support *both* AFSK and FSK. If the user follows the instructions to use the transceiver mode that disables the microphone (or disconnects it with certain older Yaesu a; /archives//html/RTTY/2017-10/msg00093.html (12,990 bytes)
31. Re: [RTTY] Intel NUC, anyone? (score: 1): Author: Jay <ws7ik7tj@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2017 07:56:53 -0700; As do Mountain West Radio Rigblaster Advantages. On 10/27/2017 7:47 AM, True. However, the interfaces support *both* AFSK and FSK. If the user follows the instructions to use the transceiver mode th; /archives//html/RTTY/2017-10/msg00094.html (14,287 bytes)
32. Re: [RTTY] Intel NUC, anyone? (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>; Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2017 11:03:07 -0400; Ah, but they use EXTFSK (software FSK), not a true hardware UART with a bit clock that is not subject to operating system jitter. 73, ... Joe, W4TV On 10/27/2017 7:47 AM, True. However, the interfac; /archives//html/RTTY/2017-10/msg00095.html (14,622 bytes)
33. Re: [RTTY] Intel NUC, anyone? (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>; Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2017 11:06:37 -0400; Edgeport is the only maker of USB to Serial converters that I know of that properly support low (45, 50 and 75 baud) data rates. Again, their converters are microprocessor based with a hardware bit c; /archives//html/RTTY/2017-10/msg00096.html (9,935 bytes)
34. Re: [RTTY] Intel NUC, anyone? (score: 1): Author: "GL-DJ3IW-Web" <GL-DJ3IW@web.de>; Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2017 11:06:54 -0500; Hi, of the newer ICOM rigs I had the 756-Pro3, IC7700 and now the IC-7851. All of them allow to set (RX-) filter width down to 50Hz in the USB-(LSB-) Data modes. It's all software.... Looking into th; /archives//html/RTTY/2017-10/msg00097.html (17,219 bytes)
35. [RTTY] Intel NUC, anyone? (score: 1): Author: "David G3YYD" <g3yyd@btinternet.com>; Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2017 11:11:38 -0500; Larry K8UT also wrote an equivalent for the Raspberry Pi see http://www.k8ut.com/wpfb-file/rpifsk-v1-2-zip/ I have test K0SM Arduino TinyFSK and it works very well without any timing jitter. 2Tone wi; /archives//html/RTTY/2017-10/msg00098.html (8,070 bytes)
36. Re: [RTTY] Intel NUC, anyone? (score: 1): Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2017 10:33:36 -0500; Seen it go by here many time ... and never looked into it. An Arduino nano board is, like, $12. I think this is where I will go for FSK. Not clear on how MMTTY (in N1MM or in WinWarbler or by itself); /archives//html/RTTY/2017-10/msg00099.html (9,007 bytes)
37. Re: [RTTY] Intel NUC, anyone? (score: 1): Author: Lee Roberts <ham@n0sq.tech>; Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2017 10:10:42 -0600; I don't know why there is so much "heartburn" in the AFSK vs FSK debate. I've used both methods and I haven't had any significant difference in my contest scores. IMHO, you can't go wrong with either; /archives//html/RTTY/2017-10/msg00100.html (8,275 bytes)
38. Re: [RTTY] Intel NUC, anyone? (score: 1): Author: "Jim N7US" <jim@n7us.net>; Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2017 12:07:41 -0500; Is the FSK produced by MMTTY or 2Tone and an Edgeport 45.45 baud? 73, Jim N7US --Original Message-- Edgeport is the only maker of USB to Serial converters that I know of that properly support low (45; /archives//html/RTTY/2017-10/msg00102.html (9,808 bytes)
39. Re: [RTTY] Intel NUC, anyone? (score: 1): Author: "David G3YYD" <g3yyd@btinternet.com>; Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2017 14:01:46 -0500; Jim Yes to 2Tone. It is really simple to set up. 73 David G3YYD Is the FSK produced by MMTTY or 2Tone and an Edgeport 45.45 baud? 73, Jim N7US --Original Message-- Edgeport is the only maker of USB t; /archives//html/RTTY/2017-10/msg00104.html (10,800 bytes)
40. Re: [RTTY] Intel NUC, anyone? (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>; Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2017 14:05:24 -0400; No, it is 45 baud as Windows can only set *integer* values for baud rate. That is the one true advantage of AFSK, the software generates (effectively) "x cycles of y Hz tone" which allows arbitrary b; /archives//html/RTTY/2017-10/msg00105.html (10,850 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3]