Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+It\s+seems\s+that\s+there\s+were\s+some\s+stations\,during\s+ARRL\s+RTTY\s+Roundup\,\s+on\s+14\.100MHz\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+It\s+seems\s+that\s+there\s+were\s+some\s+stations\,during\s+ARRL\s+RTTY\s+Roundup\,\s+on\s+14\.100MHz\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [RTTY] It seems that there were some stations,during ARRL RTTY Roundup, on 14.100MHz (score: 1): Author: Graeme Caselton <gcaselton@yahoo.com>; Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 18:07:33 -0800 (PST); for the first time I noticed some deliberate QRM'ing of those RTTY stations at the bottom end of the band, going in to the CW portion, by both RTTY and CW: printed from 7.02277MHz at 23:09 onwards QS; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00092.html (9,113 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] It seems that there were some stations,during ARRL RTTY Roundup, on 14.100MHz (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>; Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 18:45:14 -0800; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: <snip> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Just for the record, there is no "CW portion", at least in the US. CW is allowed in any part of any band. There IS however,; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00099.html (7,564 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]