Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+JARTS\s+RTTY\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+JARTS\s+RTTY\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] JARTS RTTY (score: 1): Author: "Dick White" <whiter26@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 20:47:05 -0500; I was able to get in 6 1/2 hours for this one. I accomplished my goal of having some fun. I only worked one call that was older than I am by two years. He sent me 84. Surprise was to work 3B8GT on 20; /archives//html/RTTY/2008-10/msg00153.html (7,032 bytes)
2. [RTTY] JARTS RTTY (score: 1): Author: "Dick White" <whiter26@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 09:31:57 -0500; I had a great time in this fun contest. I didn't find an op older than my 83 until I worked G3RSD who came back with 84. I had a good laugh from the two ops who came back wit "WOW, 83, THAT IS GREAT.; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-10/msg00141.html (7,660 bytes)
3. [RTTY] JARTS RTTY (score: 1): Author: "Dick White" <whiter26@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 19:45:02 -0500; Band QSO's Pts Cty Sec 3.5 9 18 0 5 7 47 100 9 11 14 159 382 25 13 21 27 64 11 7 Total 242 564 45 36 Score: 45,684 With my amp blown, and my rotor broken with the beam pointed East and not able to tu; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-10/msg00079.html (7,164 bytes)
4. [RTTY] JARTS RTTY (score: 1): Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@frontier.com>; Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 10:37:07 -0700; What is going to be the strategy for working the JARTS on 80? It says the JA RTTY frequencies are 3520 to 3530 and 3599 to 3612. We won't be able to work the upper end as that is too close to 3600. A; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-10/msg00087.html (6,621 bytes)
5. Re: [RTTY] JARTS RTTY (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 11:49:51 -0700; I've worked the 3599-3600 slot a few times with some success. Just remember your mark frequency is the higher of the two and don't let it get above about 3599.8 to allow for sidebands. And of course,; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-10/msg00088.html (7,767 bytes)
6. Re: [RTTY] JARTS RTTY (score: 1): Author: Al Kozakiewicz <akozak@hourglass.com>; Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 14:58:12 -0400; I don't know why RTTY is not allowed throughout the entire band. From a bandwidth standpoint, SSTV and RTTY are distinctions without a difference. Doesn't setting the carrier to a max of 3.597.7 with; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-10/msg00090.html (8,428 bytes)
7. Re: [RTTY] JARTS RTTY (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 12:36:26 -0700; 3597.7 + 2.295 = 3599.995. Two thoughts: First, that's only 5 Hz below the upper US band limit. I wouldn't trust my VFO that much. And second, that does not allow for the sidebands generated by RTTY.; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-10/msg00091.html (7,942 bytes)
8. Re: [RTTY] JARTS RTTY (score: 1): Author: Ktfrog007@aol.com; Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 17:01:02 -0400 (EDT); Sounds like s split situation. Do the JAs work split on 80? 73, Kermit, AB1J In a message dated 10/13/2011 7:36:52 P.M. GMT Standard Time, dezrat1242@yahoo.com writes: For the second part of your que; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-10/msg00095.html (7,415 bytes)
9. Re: [RTTY] JARTS RTTY (score: 1): Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@frontier.com>; Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 17:12:27 -0700; Don't know. Would be interesting to hear from them. 73 tom W7WHY Sounds like a split situation. Do the JAs work split on 80? 73, Kermit, AB1J For the second part of your question, the JA segment exte; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-10/msg00100.html (8,037 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]