- 1. [RTTY] JARTS age histogram (score: 1)
- Author: Tim Shoppa <tshoppa@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 22:56:17 -0400
- Did a quick histogram on ages received in JARTS contest exchanges. I removed 00's, 99's, the guys who would only send me serial number 001, and only count each call once (even if worked on multiple b
- /archives//html/RTTY/2015-10/msg00100.html (7,306 bytes)
- 2. Re: [RTTY] JARTS age histogram (score: 1)
- Author: Jerry Flanders <jeflanders@comcast.net>
- Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 00:05:45 -0400
- I worked a 15 year old. Also worked your 93 year old. Jerry W4UK Youngest guy I worked was 22, oldest was 93, most populous age range was 65-69. Age cnt 10-14 0 15-19 0 20-24 1 * 25-29 0 30-34 2 ** 3
- /archives//html/RTTY/2015-10/msg00101.html (8,768 bytes)
- 3. Re: [RTTY] JARTS age histogram (score: 1)
- Author: <k5ww@coyotearc.net>
- Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 23:19:38 -0500
- We logged a 12 year "old" at KN5S. Not bad! 73, Erik - K5WW I worked a 15 year old. Also worked your 93 year old. Jerry W4UK At 10:56 PM 10/19/2015, Tim Shoppa wrote: ________________________________
- /archives//html/RTTY/2015-10/msg00102.html (9,159 bytes)
- 4. Re: [RTTY] JARTS age histogram (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
- Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 10:58:32 -0700
- -- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: Interesting Tim, thanks. The youngest guy I worked sent me 12 but at the time I wondered if that was really a serial number. I logged it anyway. 73, Bill
- /archives//html/RTTY/2015-10/msg00103.html (7,052 bytes)
- 5. Re: [RTTY] JARTS age histogram (score: 1)
- Author: Don AA5AU <aa5au@bellsouth.net>
- Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 03:24:23 +0000 (UTC)
- In 2011, I did an analysis on the ages of those competing in JARTS that year from logs received by various operators. The most populous age group in 2011 was 60-64. So considering we are four years o
- /archives//html/RTTY/2015-10/msg00109.html (10,307 bytes)
- 6. Re: [RTTY] JARTS age histogram (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
- Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 20:35:42 -0700
- -- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: Not surprising, really. Kids are into computers, cell phones, tablets and the like. Faster, cheaper, no antenna or HOA problems, no license etc, etc. Tal
- /archives//html/RTTY/2015-10/msg00110.html (7,853 bytes)
- 7. Re: [RTTY] JARTS age histogram (score: 1)
- Author: Ron W7FIA <fia@clouddancer.com>
- Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 21:20:46 -0700 (PDT)
- Anywhere? Not on this side of the Sierras, nor to the north. Away from interstates and cities, good luck. Anybody? I've had conversations with people I had zero chance of dialing up. -- r __________
- /archives//html/RTTY/2015-10/msg00111.html (8,231 bytes)
- 8. Re: [RTTY] JARTS age histogram (score: 1)
- Author: Ron Kolarik <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>
- Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 00:17:27 -0500
- On 10/21/2015 10:24 PM, Don AA5AU wrote: In 2011, I did an analysis on the ages of those competing in JARTS that year from logs received by various operators. The most populous age group in 2011 was
- /archives//html/RTTY/2015-10/msg00112.html (9,882 bytes)
- 9. Re: [RTTY] JARTS age histogram (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
- Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 00:30:24 -0700
- -- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: Perhaps you have forgotten about satellite internet? Our here in the middle of the desert, miles from the nearest town, it works fine. I'm using it right
- /archives//html/RTTY/2015-10/msg00113.html (8,447 bytes)
- 10. Re: [RTTY] JARTS age histogram (score: 1)
- Author: " pcooper" <pcooper@guernsey.net>
- Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 09:38:20 -0700
- Hi all, The age analysis is quite interesting, but I have a few other options that may just be worth considering. While I agree that it does appear that we are all getting older, and that the lower a
- /archives//html/RTTY/2015-10/msg00114.html (8,703 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu