- 1. [RTTY] K4WW SOABHP (score: 1)
- Author: k4ww at arrl.net (Shelby Summerville)
- Date: Mon Aug 18 06:42:59 2003
- Time spent "on the air" was less than last year, therefore score is also less. With all of the JA's active, I worked 62, it made me wonder if this was JARTS? If not for the JA's and other Far East st
- /archives//html/RTTY/2002-11/msg00229.html (7,448 bytes)
- 2. [RTTY] K4WW SOABHP (score: 1)
- Author: k4ww@arrl.net (Shelby Summerville)
- Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2002 12:19:43 -0400
- Another one in the log! I suppose I shouldn't have complained about the lack of activity on 80 meters, as, percentage wise, it was my most productive band! I made 12 contacts on 80, all multipliers!
- /archives//html/RTTY/2002-08/msg00180.html (7,262 bytes)
- 3. [RTTY] K4WW SOABHP (score: 1)
- Author: k4ww@arrl.net (Shelby Summerville)
- Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2002 06:44:59 -0400
- I knew beforehand this couldn't be a "serious" effort, but little did I know it would be so frustrating! We were finishing a complete bathroom remodeling, and I knew my time Saturday would be very li
- /archives//html/RTTY/2002-06/msg00092.html (7,920 bytes)
- 4. [RTTY] K4WW SOABHP (score: 1)
- Author: k4ww@arrl.net (Shelby Summerville)
- Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2002 20:31:45 -0400
- There seems to be a scoring discrepancy using WF1B v5.02, so this is an "edited" score. WF1B gave me "0" points for all contacts with US stations and Cabrillo Converter gave me "0" credit for all EA
- /archives//html/RTTY/2002-04/msg00065.html (6,797 bytes)
- 5. [RTTY] K4WW SOABHP (score: 1)
- Author: k4ww@home.com (Shelby Summerville)
- Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 07:28:00 -0500
- Not nearly as much fun as operating from NV! Also learned that I don't have to go to NV for it to snow on RR Sunday! Nice to see several CW/SSB regulars, although some of them need to realize that sh
- /archives//html/RTTY/2002-01/msg00058.html (7,046 bytes)
- 6. [RTTY] K4WW SOABHP (score: 1)
- Author: chen@mac.com (Kok Chen)
- Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2002 06:42:13 -0800
- One of them sent me AGN and I completely missed it in the clutter until he sent it the third time, and only then did I I realized there was a real message. The first two times, I'd thought he had tro
- /archives//html/RTTY/2002-01/msg00059.html (6,556 bytes)
- 7. [RTTY] K4WW SOABHP (score: 1)
- Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
- Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2004 14:20:48 -0500
- Very limited effort, but noticed some disturbing "changes" in exchanges. In marginal band conditions, the least amount of "stuff" preceding the necessary exchange only leaves room for error and repea
- /archives//html/RTTY/2004-02/msg00079.html (7,374 bytes)
- 8. [RTTY] K4WW SOABHP (score: 1)
- Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
- Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2004 12:35:11 -0400
- Call: K4WW Operator(s): K4WW Station: K4WW Class: SOAB HP QTH: KY Operating Time (hrs): 10 Summary: Band QSOs Pts Mults -- 80: 5 10 40: 45 291 20: 187 1503 15: 63 523 10: 0 0 -- Total: 300 2327 111 +
- /archives//html/RTTY/2004-04/msg00311.html (7,521 bytes)
- 9. Fw: [RTTY] K4WW SOABHP (score: 1)
- Author: "Dick White" <whiter26@sbcglobal.net>
- Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2004 19:24:27 -0500
- Shelby, I saw this happen just the way you describe it. When I got into RTTY the operators seemed to respect one another. It looks like our nice mode is not immune to those who do not care about othe
- /archives//html/RTTY/2004-04/msg00317.html (7,346 bytes)
- 10. Re: [RTTY] K4WW SOABHP (score: 1)
- Author: "VA3XRZ [Q]" <va3xrz@qsl.net>
- Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2004 23:38:53 -0400
- There is people out there with really dumb ideas like putting up an uncoordinated beacon that is up only on weekends in the most congested HF band, see below an excerpt from www.qrz.com: "New beacon
- /archives//html/RTTY/2004-04/msg00338.html (8,835 bytes)
- 11. Re: [RTTY] K4WW SOABHP (score: 1)
- Author: "VA3XRZ-Y" <va3xrz@yahoo.ca>
- Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2004 00:06:28 -0400
- There is people out there with really dumb ideas like putting up an uncoordinated beacon that is up only on weekends in the most congested HF band, see below an excerpt from www.qrz.com: "New beacon
- /archives//html/RTTY/2004-04/msg00339.html (8,907 bytes)
- 12. Re: [RTTY] K4WW SOABHP (score: 1)
- Author: "Gert E. Janssens" <k5ww@sbcglobal.net>
- Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2004 09:51:13 -0500
- Oh brother. Now all we need is some "I've owned this frequency for 2 decades" Pactor stations between .090 and .100.... 73, Gert - K5WW mHz. enough Icom ______________________________________________
- /archives//html/RTTY/2004-04/msg00343.html (10,035 bytes)
- 13. Re: [RTTY] K4WW SOABHP (score: 1)
- Author: dj3iw@t-online.de (DJ3IW Goetz)
- Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2004 15:50:44 -0000
- They are there, between 14080 and 14090. 73 de Goetz dj3iw@t-online.de -- Original Message -- From: "Gert E. Janssens" <k5ww@sbcglobal.net> To: "RTTY Reflector" <rtty@contesting.com> Sent: Wednesday,
- /archives//html/RTTY/2004-04/msg00345.html (11,344 bytes)
- 14. [RTTY] K4WW SOABHP (score: 1)
- Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
- Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2004 20:17:48 -0400
- Band conditions certainly left some to be desired, and the passing thunderstorms, on both days, didn't help matters, either! Participation seemed about normal? No sense in "preaching to the choir", b
- /archives//html/RTTY/2004-06/msg00058.html (7,461 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu