Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+LOTW\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+LOTW\s*$/: 63 ]

Total 63 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] LoTW (score: 1): Author: "ak0a" <ak0a@kc.rr.com>; Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2003 13:08:40 -0600; any Guru on Lotw, please email me direct. Thanks ak0a@kc,rr,com _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty; /archives//html/RTTY/2003-11/msg00176.html (6,117 bytes)
2. [RTTY] LOTW (score: 1): Author: "bill.w7tvf" <bill.w7tvf@air-internet.com>; Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 21:30:24 -0000; HI, For anyone who needs confirmation of past qso's with W7TVF, I just uploaded all QSO's from 1952 to date TO LOTW. 73, Bill Dawson W7TVF _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-09/msg00312.html (6,519 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] LOTW (score: 1): Author: Larry L Lindblom <llindblom@juno.com>; Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 17:54:31 -0500; I uploaded Qs to LOTW going back to around 1969. After seeing your message out of curiosity I queried LOTW for QSLs from 1970 through 1990. This yielded two confirmed QSOs. It appears we are among th; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-09/msg00318.html (7,166 bytes)
4. Re: [RTTY] LOTW (score: 1): Author: "FireBrick" <w9ol@billnjudy.com>; Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 18:10:13 -0500; I have ALL my logs going back to July '67 on LoTW. I didn't start with RTTY though till the mid 90's. Earliest qsl via LoTW was 1971 -- Original Message -- From: "Larry L Lindblom" <llindblom@juno.co; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-09/msg00321.html (9,128 bytes)
5. Re: [RTTY] LOTW (score: 1): Author: "radioman" <radioman@semarg.ath.cx>; Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 19:25:16 -0400; this is a stupid question.. but what is the proper address to send the log to.. I keep getting it back... I did fix the RTTY issue but I never got a reply that it took it this time... Tony __________; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-09/msg00322.html (9,983 bytes)
6. Re: [RTTY] LOTW (score: 1): Author: "FireBrick" <w9ol@billnjudy.com>; Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 18:28:40 -0500; On 9/28/2004 6:25:16 PM, radioman (radioman@semarg.ath.cx) wrote: this is a stupid question.. but what is the proper address to send the log to.. I keep getting it back... I did fix the RTTY issue bu; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-09/msg00323.html (8,095 bytes)
7. Re: [RTTY] LOTW (score: 1): Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 16:33:36 -0700 (PDT); I have been AD1C since September, 1978 and all those QSOs are uploaded. I was WN1UHA and WA1UHA before that (starting December 1974). I have the QSOs in the computer, but never applied for certificat; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-09/msg00324.html (8,379 bytes)
8. Re: [RTTY] LOTW (score: 1): Author: "radioman" <radioman@semarg.ath.cx>; Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 19:35:46 -0400; Oops, Sri now IM being a bone head.. I guess I got the address correct rtty@cqww.com and corrected the RTTY issue.. but no return reply on the BOOT excepted it.. Sri Fred.. I just replied to the wron; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-09/msg00325.html (8,975 bytes)
9. Re: [RTTY] LOTW (score: 1): Author: Larry L Lindblom <llindblom@juno.com>; Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 19:18:44 -0500; RR use TQSL Cert file menu to request the Certs you need. 73. _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-09/msg00327.html (8,792 bytes)
10. Re: [RTTY] LOTW (score: 1): Author: "radioman" <radioman@semarg.ath.cx>; Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 22:12:46 -0400; its got it this time.. the Log that is.. i need to look into the LoTw the credit thing is a little confusing.. Tony _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.c; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-09/msg00329.html (11,182 bytes)
11. [RTTY] LOTW (score: 1): Author: "Tim Pearson" <ku4j@hiwaay.net>; Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 11:08:37 -0500; On a side note about LOTW has anyone noticed that participation in LOTW seems to hit a brick wall. There seems to be very little participation outside the US which is very disappointing. Total users; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-09/msg00338.html (8,199 bytes)
12. Re: [RTTY] LOTW (score: 1): Author: WI8W <wi8w@wi8w.org>; Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 00:18:03 +0000; I think that the reason LOTW does not have as many foreign stations signed up is the process they must follow. I see it as vastly different that the way we do it and if I was living overseas I probab; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-09/msg00339.html (8,582 bytes)
13. Re: [RTTY] LOTW (score: 1): Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>; Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 11:22:06 -0500 (CDT); Even though they are digitally signed? Gee, I thought that would impress folks way more than the cards. :-) -- 73, Peter Laws N5UWY/9 WAC (phone) WAS #51466 (SSB) ____________________________________; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-09/msg00340.html (8,038 bytes)
14. Re: [RTTY] LOTW (score: 1): Author: "William D.Storer" <wstorer@cinci.rr.com>; Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 12:48:31 -0400; Tim, I've talked with several dx stations recently that said they were in the process of applying to LOTW. It's like anything new, you can't gauge a programs success in one year period. The words get; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-09/msg00343.html (9,330 bytes)
15. Re: [RTTY] LOTW (score: 1): Author: Mark Perrin <mperrin@ordata.com>; Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 10:35:01 -0700; I am new to RTTY, just over a year now, but found that RTTY ops world wide are using LoTW. I think I have 40-45 QSO's confirmed on LoTW for RTTY DXCC for which I do not have cards. - enabled me to ge; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-09/msg00344.html (10,065 bytes)
16. [RTTY] LOTW (score: 1): Author: "N6OJ [Chuck]" <n6oj@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2007 14:54:57 -0700; Hi All Bill must have seen his contacts that he uploaded when he did a search for N8S qso's Chuck N6OJ _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lis; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-09/msg00077.html (6,074 bytes)
17. Re: [RTTY] LOTW (score: 1): Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 15:13:40 -0700 (PDT); I've been exchanging E-mail with Bill. Yes, he has N8S in his LoTW log, he's not making it up :-) I thought it was a 1x1 search problem on the "Find Call" LoTW page, but K7C QSOs have been uploaded.; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-09/msg00078.html (7,668 bytes)
18. Re: [RTTY] LOTW (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>; Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2007 15:12:34 -0700; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- I think you're right. I clicked the "Your QSOs" tab, thinking that was confirmed QSOs. Sorry guys. Duh. Bill W6WRT ______________________________________________; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-09/msg00079.html (6,952 bytes)
19. Re: [RTTY] LOTW (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>; Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2007 15:20:53 -0700; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- Well, there is one other way. Some dummy at this end didn't check the "confirmed" box, so all that showed is what I uploaded. Sorry guys. Duh. Bill W6WRT _______; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-09/msg00080.html (6,952 bytes)
20. [RTTY] LOTW (score: 1): Author: "Steve and Judy" <hodgson@cytanet.com.cy>; Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 09:26:08 +0200; Thanks to everyone for their replies to my recent post. Sorry guys but I have not managed to get around to LOTW, maybe one of these days. At present I much prefer the old method. If you need a card p; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-11/msg00138.html (6,357 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4]