Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+LOTW\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+LOTW\s*$/: 63 ]

Total 63 documents matching your query.

21. [RTTY] LOTW (score: 1): Author: Roger Cooke <roger@g3ldi.co.uk>; Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 18:30:31 +0000; Hi. Just a comment from an old Luddite G3!! I don't subscribe to either LOTW or E-QSL. The Cluster has taken a lot of skill from DX-ing too and has much to answer for. Now, before you reach for the k; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-12/msg00029.html (8,111 bytes)
22. Re: [RTTY] LOTW (score: 1): Author: Gedking@aol.com; Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2007 19:50:12 EST; I sure remember those days when I was a novice and those QSO's with all the standard info. rig,ant,name,QTH es wx, ect.and all at 5-7 WPM. you know I discovered what nobody mentions today, that is he; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-12/msg00034.html (6,906 bytes)
23. Re: [RTTY] LOTW (score: 1): Author: "Glenn VA3DX" <va3dx@sympatico.ca>; Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 17:41:21 -0400; Since the RTTY guys use LOTW alot , I have a question. When I go into my AWARDS and look say at the CHALLENGE totals, some of the slots have a number , rather than a callsign.. Can anyone tell me wha; /archives//html/RTTY/2008-03/msg00260.html (6,260 bytes)
24. [RTTY] LOTW (score: 1): Author: Torben Kahr <OZ9GA@dixit.dk>; Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 20:21:45 +0100; I have just uploaded CQWW and JARTS to LOTW for my contestcall 5P9X. It gave 54 DXCC 73 de OZ9GA Torben OZ9GA@dixit.dk _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contestin; /archives//html/RTTY/2008-10/msg00216.html (6,340 bytes)
25. [RTTY] LOTW (score: 1): Author: Torben Kahr <OZ9GA@dixit.dk>; Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 02:06:30 +0100; I have just uloaded all my RTTY QSO's from since 1976 and ontil now for OZ9GA and 5P9X All in all 24.928 QSO's It gave 114 DXCC and 47 WAS (only need Montana, Nevada and West Virginia) 73 de OZ9GA To; /archives//html/RTTY/2008-11/msg00008.html (7,129 bytes)
26. Re: [RTTY] LOTW (score: 1): Author: "Peter Laws" <plaws@plaws.net>; Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 19:20:49 -0600; Holy cow! Any idea what your QSL rate (match rate) is for those QSO records? -- Peter Laws | N5UWY | plaws plaws net | Travel by Train! No Trillion-dollar blank check for crooks! ____________________; /archives//html/RTTY/2008-11/msg00009.html (7,551 bytes)
27. Re: [RTTY] LOTW (score: 1): Author: Torben Kahr <OZ9GA@dixit.dk>; Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 02:29:59 +0100; Ok there is 6.868 matching of the 24.928 it is ap. 28% 73 de OZ9GA Torben OZ9GA@dixit.dk Den 06/11/2008 kl. 2.20 skrev Peter Laws: _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RT; /archives//html/RTTY/2008-11/msg00010.html (8,194 bytes)
28. Re: [RTTY] LOTW (score: 1): Author: "Andrei Stchislenok" <asnp3d@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 20:42:24 -0500; Congrats, Torben! I worked you 11 times in 2005-2008. Have all your QSL's in LoTW. -- 73's Andrei EW1AR-NP3D -- DXCC RTTY via LoTW only Who has what? - World Wide Rating Please visit: www.k4fo.com/cq; /archives//html/RTTY/2008-11/msg00011.html (9,250 bytes)
29. Re: [RTTY] LOTW (score: 1): Author: "John Becker, WØJAB" <w0jab@big-river.net>; Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2008 19:50:39 -0600; What about a QSL card? That is the main reason I will not use LOTW. It seem to have replaced QSL cards. _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://li; /archives//html/RTTY/2008-11/msg00012.html (7,235 bytes)
30. Re: [RTTY] LOTW (score: 1): Author: "Andrei Stchislenok" <asnp3d@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 20:58:12 -0500; Yes, in many cases ut does. And saves bucks, too. And paper. Especially when you making thousands QSO's during the Contests. If I need QSL from a particular station, or receive from someone who need; /archives//html/RTTY/2008-11/msg00013.html (8,723 bytes)
31. Re: [RTTY] LOTW (score: 1): Author: Fabi va2up <va2up@live.ca>; Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 21:11:13 -0500; Well John I will agree with you when I will stop contesting. The good ol' paper is just fine for the everyday or occasional operator but LotW was for me a real savior in terms of available time to be; /archives//html/RTTY/2008-11/msg00014.html (8,585 bytes)
32. [RTTY] LOTW (score: 1): Author: Torben Kahr <OZ9GA@dixit.dk>; Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 08:03:20 +0100; I am still using QSL-cards for all my everyday QSO's with the Call OZ9GA. For contest I will only send cards when I recive cards. I now use the call 5P9X in contest. But all QSO's will be on LOTW als; /archives//html/RTTY/2008-11/msg00016.html (7,593 bytes)
33. Re: [RTTY] LOTW (score: 1): Author: "Glenn VA3DX" <va3dx@sympatico.ca>; Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 04:15:03 -0500; LOTW General log ( all modes - everyday log - contest logs ) 135,720 qsos in LOTW = 31,818 qso matches 23.44 % Glenn VA3DX -- _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@co; /archives//html/RTTY/2008-11/msg00018.html (8,496 bytes)
34. Re: [RTTY] LOTW (score: 1): Author: "Peter Laws" <plaws@plaws.net>; Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 07:43:38 -0600; I don't have nearly as many in: 7326 QSOs (per LoTW which includes about 400 zombies, near as I can tell), 3086 QSLs So that's either 42% or 44% depending on whether you take out the zombies. -- Pete; /archives//html/RTTY/2008-11/msg00021.html (8,142 bytes)
35. Re: [RTTY] LOTW (score: 1): Author: Gedking@aol.com; Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 09:31:17 EST; How do you go about putting in all your old paper logs? ED K8OT **AOL Search: Your one stop for directions, recipes and all other Holiday needs. Search Now. (http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100000075x1; /archives//html/RTTY/2008-11/msg00022.html (7,739 bytes)
36. Re: [RTTY] LOTW (score: 1): Author: Torben Kahr <OZ9GA@dixit.dk>; Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 16:11:07 +0100; I had made a logprogram in FileMake Pro and now I made som export fields for creating the .adi-files. it vas not easy, but now all QSO's are in LOTW even those from the paperlogs..... 73 de OZ9GA Tor; /archives//html/RTTY/2008-11/msg00023.html (8,572 bytes)
37. Re: [RTTY] LOTW (score: 1): Author: "Peter Laws" <plaws@plaws.net>; Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 11:30:34 -0600; Fast Log Entry (FLE) - by DF3CB (http://www.df3cb.com/fle.html) actually looks like a pretty good way of digitizing paper logs. Was discussed on the LoTW list a while back. Of course, anything since; /archives//html/RTTY/2008-11/msg00024.html (8,511 bytes)
38. Re: [RTTY] LOTW (score: 1): Author: "Eric - VE3GSI" <ve3gsi@sympatico.ca>; Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 16:29:36 -0500; John, Not a thing wrong with using both - my station is 100% Card if requested and I still use LoTW. With using LoTW only, I have the DXCC/Mixed and WAS/Mixed/Rtty certificates, both without the serv; /archives//html/RTTY/2008-11/msg00029.html (9,471 bytes)
39. Re: [RTTY] LOTW (score: 1): Author: "Andrei Stchislenok" <asnp3d@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 21:13:09 -0500; I have in my LoTW (all calls, all modes but most in RTTY (abt 70%) at the moment: You are *NP3D* *Log Off* <https://p1k.arrl.org/lotwuser/default?logout=1> You have *98,035* QSO records You have *32,; /archives//html/RTTY/2008-11/msg00034.html (10,379 bytes)
40. [RTTY] LOTW (score: 1): Author: "Dave Hachadorian" <K6LL@ARRL.net>; Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2009 14:07:39 -0800; I have 48 states confirmed so far on RTTY from the last weekend's Roundup. Just need North Dakota and Louisiana. Get with the program you Northies and Cajuns! Dave Hachadorian, K6LL Yuma, AZ ________; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-01/msg00230.html (6,880 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4]