Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+LOTW\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+LOTW\s*$/: 63 ]

Total 63 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [RTTY] LOTW (score: 1): Author: Art Searle W2NRA <w2nra@optonline.net>; Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2009 17:15:41 -0500; Hi Dave, thanks for the 2 QSOs. They were there, I worked 4 LAs and 1 ND (and I heard a couple of other NDs answering Run stations. I missed OR, WV and WY. How could I miss OR? ______________________; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-01/msg00234.html (7,395 bytes)
42. Re: [RTTY] LOTW (score: 1): Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>; Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2009 14:46:23 -0800; Perhaps you didn't CQ for long enough for me to find you? :-) :-) There were a few Oregon stations that were CQ'ing (W7YES, N1KEZ, K0JJ, AC7ZG, K6UM, K7ZS), but I don't remember hearing any who did i; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-01/msg00239.html (7,337 bytes)
43. [RTTY] LoTW (score: 1): Author: Mark Perrin <mperrin@ordata.com>; Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2009 13:41:32 -0800; It is true that RTTY contesters upload their logs to LoTW very quickly, and routinely. Admit "anxious" to get RTTY part of Triple Play WAS out of way. Only able to operate 9 hours in RU last weekend;; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-01/msg00285.html (7,218 bytes)
44. Re: [RTTY] LoTW (score: 1): Author: Mark Perrin <mperrin@ordata.com>; Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2009 13:47:55 -0800; Just after I posted this, WV showed up. Tnx to KD8ILL for confirming that. RTTY and LoTW go hand in hand .... :-) 73, Mark _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@conte; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-01/msg00286.html (7,610 bytes)
45. Re: [RTTY] LoTW (score: 1): Author: "Peter Laws" <plaws0@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 16:39:01 -0600; I missed a couple (AR, OK, for example) but still have 41 confirmed for the "easy" leg of Triple Play. I believe I will end up with the same 47, or close to it, that I have for regular WAS RTTY. Loca; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-01/msg00290.html (7,814 bytes)
46. [RTTY] LOTW (score: 1): Author: "Jim W7RY" <w7ry@arrl.net>; Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 21:11:28 -0800; Ok.. So I uploaded my Roundup log to LOTW. I see all my 1300 qso records and 800 qsl records. Now how do I find out if I have WAS? Or DXCC? Thanks Jim W7RY ___________________________________________; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-01/msg00438.html (7,387 bytes)
47. Re: [RTTY] LOTW (score: 1): Author: Iain MacDonnell - N6ML <ar@dseven.org>; Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 21:13:30 -0800; Look under the "Awards" tab. ~Iain / N6ML _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-01/msg00439.html (7,503 bytes)
48. Re: [RTTY] LOTW (score: 1): Author: "Robert Chudek - K0RC" <k0rc@citlink.net>; Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 23:28:03 -0600; You could use my RTTY Roundup Log Analyzer. It's a free download from here: http://tinyurl.com/8juedc Unfortunately it won't tell you about DXCC but it will show you all the states you worked and on; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-01/msg00440.html (8,487 bytes)
49. Re: [RTTY] LOTW (score: 1): Author: "Jim W7RY" <w7ry@arrl.net>; Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 22:00:26 -0800; Now that's cool! Someone (an Excel wizard) came up with that one!! And yes, I did work all states. I'll get some credits bought and submit for my WAS award. Thanks 73 Jim W7RY -- No virus found in th; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-01/msg00441.html (9,413 bytes)
50. Re: [RTTY] LOTW (score: 1): Author: "Bill Gillenwater" <gillie@pa.net>; Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 08:36:00 -0500; It's as easy as that! Cool huh! I have over 21k qso's at LOTW, some as old as 1980, The QSL rate via LOTW is over 33 percent. Amazing. 73 Bill K3SV Now that's cool! Someone (an Excel wizard) came up; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-01/msg00443.html (10,604 bytes)
51. Re: [RTTY] LOTW (score: 1): Author: "Bill Gillenwater" <gillie@pa.net>; Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 10:26:45 -0500; I've had a few inquiries about my 33 percent QSL rate. Let me break it down a little bit. If you look back to the older QSO's, the rate of confirmation via LOTW is very low, however, as you get into; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-01/msg00444.html (12,630 bytes)
52. Re: [RTTY] LOTW (score: 1): Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 09:40:07 -0600; If you look at your RTTY QSOs, particularly since LoTW came online in 2003, you'll get an even higher match rate - mine is over 50% for RTTY. Even this past November's phone SS has had a good match r; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-01/msg00446.html (8,583 bytes)
53. [RTTY] LOTW (score: 1): Author: "DickT-W0RAA" <dickt@w0raa.com>; Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 19:14:20 -0600; They sure didn't say much when it went down. Dick W0RAA _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-09/msg00145.html (6,792 bytes)
54. Re: [RTTY] LOTW (score: 1): Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@frontier.com>; Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 18:26:10 -0700; H'mm, I just checked it and it's working here. Actually picked up a couple of new ones in the CQWW. 73 Tom W7WHY They sure didn't say much when it went down. Dick W0RAA ______________________________; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-09/msg00146.html (6,722 bytes)
55. [RTTY] LoTW (score: 1): Author: "Dick White" <whiter26@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2013 16:09:07 -0600; I up loaded my file after the CQ WPX RTTY contest on 13-02-2013 and have not received a confirmation. Is there still a big delay ? I need to send in another RTTY file but would like to get the last u; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-02/msg00488.html (7,408 bytes)
56. Re: [RTTY] LoTW (score: 1): Author: W2GR@aol.com; Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2013 17:13:24 -0500 (EST); There does not seem to be any delay...the status says abt 4 minute delay.....here is the link... 73, Mike W2GR _http://www.arrl.org/logbook-queue-status_ (http://www.arrl.org/logbook-queue-status) --; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-02/msg00489.html (7,802 bytes)
57. Re: [RTTY] LoTW (score: 1): Author: "Ron Kolarik" <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>; Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2013 16:29:06 -0600; Dick, log on to LOTW and check "Activity" under your account. That will tell you the status of the upload. Ron K0IDT I up loaded my file after the CQ WPX RTTY contest on 13-02-2013 and have not recei; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-02/msg00490.html (7,666 bytes)
58. [RTTY] LoTW (score: 1): Author: "Dick White" <whiter26@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2013 16:56:26 -0600; Thanks to W2GR, Xe2K and KD1DT for the help. I resent my file this afternoon and hope it is accepted. I just recently went from Windows XP to Windows 7 and may have missed something because I was, an; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-02/msg00491.html (7,408 bytes)
59. Re: [RTTY] LoTW (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>; Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2013 18:06:16 -0500; Logbook of the World does not acknowledge uploads. You can check the status of your uploads by logging on to LotW, selecting "Your Account" and then selecting "Your Activity". If an upload was succes; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-02/msg00492.html (8,012 bytes)
60. Re: [RTTY] LoTW (score: 1): Author: Jim Preston <jpreston1@cox.net>; Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2013 23:25:46 -0800; Dick, "Last upload for KS0M: 2013-01-11 23:06:52Z " There is no significant delay in processing, so it seems that neither upload made it. Did you happen to upload something other than a .tq8 file? 73; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-03/msg00000.html (7,273 bytes)

Current List: 41 - 60
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4]