- 1. [RTTY] LOTW QSL rate (score: 1)
- Author: "Byron Lichtenwalner" <w3wkr@verizon.net>
- Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 15:10:13 -0400
- Friends After submitting almost 5500 QSO records to LOTW you have responded with a better than 30% matching record rate. Goes up higher with each new contest. Thanks Byron, W3WKR ____________________
- /archives//html/RTTY/2005-05/msg00108.html (6,170 bytes)
- 2. Re: [RTTY] LOTW QSL rate (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
- Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 17:00:55 -0400
- I've found the response rate is greatly dependent on two things: the age of the QSOs and the location. I've placed ALL of my logged QSOs into LoTW, going back to 1976. My first confirmation is in 198
- /archives//html/RTTY/2005-05/msg00116.html (7,981 bytes)
- 3. Re: [RTTY] LOTW QSL rate (score: 1)
- Author: Ian White GM3SEK <g3sek@ifwtech.co.uk>
- Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 07:18:27 +0100
- It is simply a question of mailing a copy of the license... but you're right, many hams haven't bothered. Outside of the USA, there are a few individuals accredited by ARRL as QSL card checkers. If t
- /archives//html/RTTY/2005-05/msg00117.html (7,528 bytes)
- 4. Re: [RTTY] LOTW QSL rate (score: 1)
- Author: "Andreas Rehberg" <arehberg@gmx.de>
- Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 11:44:48 +0200 (MEST)
- Hi, well and that´s the problem for most non-Anglo-Saxon people. There´s a really deep fear of any abuse.. don´t ask me why.. probably something historic.. Another example.. nobody
- /archives//html/RTTY/2005-05/msg00119.html (7,885 bytes)
- 5. Re: [RTTY] LOTW QSL rate (score: 1)
- Author: f6irf@free.fr
- Date: Sun, 22 May 2005 21:52:30 +0200
- Hi Bill What? the steps needed ??? you must be joking ! taking and mailing a photocopy of my license and passport was far less painfull than replying to the kgs of cards I receive through the buro (i
- /archives//html/RTTY/2005-05/msg00126.html (11,957 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu