Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+MMTTY\s+VS\s+PK\-232\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+MMTTY\s+VS\s+PK\-232\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] MMTTY VS PK-232 (score: 1): Author: Joe <k0bx@qsl.net>; Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 23:45:46 +0000; This has been a very good topic. I must say that MMTTY copies better than my PK-232MBX but the '232' served me well for many years. Mostly the MMTTY does a better job of copying very weak audio rtty; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-04/msg00207.html (9,386 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] MMTTY VS PK-232 (score: 1): Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@charter.net>; Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 18:23:40 -0700; One of the best TU's that was ever conceived was the Hal ST-6. I first built the ST-5 and then the ST-6, and it would copy stations that you could just barely hear. One really neat thing with it was; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-04/msg00212.html (9,454 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]