Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+More\s+on\s+Dupes\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+More\s+on\s+Dupes\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] More on Dupes (score: 1): Author: Dick Kriss <aa5vu@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 03:14:23 -0600; I DITTO Don AA5AU's comments about the RTTY RU this year. It was fun and I did not get one 'HI DON' from operators who confused Very-Ugly for Awful-Ugly. I recall a few years ago I would get the HI D; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-01/msg00218.html (6,903 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] More on Dupes (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>; Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 09:07:17 -0800; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- We all have the busted call problem from time to time where the other station stubbornly fails to recognize it as busted. I have a macro that says: "MY CALL IS W; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-01/msg00223.html (7,390 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] More on Dupes (score: 1): Author: "Dave W7DPW" <w7dpw@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 09:53:32 -0800; I agree with Bill about the "MY CALL IS" macro. I have been using that macro for a couple of years now and it really helps. As Bill states, " helps grab the other station's attention much better" ...; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-01/msg00227.html (8,731 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]