Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+NEW\s+Rules\s+for\s+2004\s+FMRE\s+XE\s+RTTY\s+Contest\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+NEW\s+Rules\s+for\s+2004\s+FMRE\s+XE\s+RTTY\s+Contest\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] NEW Rules for 2004 FMRE XE RTTY Contest (score: 1): Author: "Don Hill AA5AU" <aa5au@bellsouth.net>; Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2003 08:25:21 -0600; Thanks to John, VK4UC, for bringing this to my attention. There is a new set of rules for the 2004 Mexico RTTY International Contest http://www.fmre.org.mx/concursos/rtty2004/new-rules-rtty-200 4-eng; /archives//html/RTTY/2003-12/msg00147.html (7,555 bytes)
2. RE: [RTTY] NEW Rules for 2004 FMRE XE RTTY Contest (score: 1): Author: "Don Hill AA5AU" <aa5au@bellsouth.net>; Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2003 08:32:37 -0600; http://www.fmre.org.mx/concursos/rtty2004/new-rules-rtty-200 4-english.pdf The link got (can't remember that big word) - ok - messed up, so use this one instead. --Original Message-- From: rtty-bounc; /archives//html/RTTY/2003-12/msg00148.html (8,398 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] NEW Rules for 2004 FMRE XE RTTY Contest (score: 1): Author: <wx4tm@tm-moore.com>; Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2003 10:22:49 -0600; ....... WOW! whatdayaknow, some little contest committee finally had the unmitigated gaul to step up and go against the big boys by recognizing the advantage of two radios over one - which is and has; /archives//html/RTTY/2003-12/msg00152.html (8,011 bytes)
4. Re: [RTTY] NEW Rules for 2004 FMRE XE RTTY Contest (score: 1): Author: "Vilnis Vosekalns" <yl2kf@arrl.net>; Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 02:53:59 +0200; Hello to all, Nice rules, but never say "hop" before - how about point # 9 in rules? Where is our Awards ? YL2KF _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com; /archives//html/RTTY/2003-12/msg00160.html (8,930 bytes)
5. RE: [RTTY] NEW Rules for 2004 FMRE XE RTTY Contest (score: 1): Author: "Don Hill AA5AU" <aa5au@bellsouth.net>; Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2003 19:13:07 -0600; Vilnis has a valid point and what he is referring to is that he probably never received his "1st Place World" award for his excellent effort in the 2002 contest. I placed 2nd World that year and also; /archives//html/RTTY/2003-12/msg00161.html (10,032 bytes)
6. Re: [RTTY] NEW Rules for 2004 FMRE XE RTTY Contest (score: 1): Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>; Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 06:18:00 -0500; "Don Hill AA5AU" <aa5au@bellsouth.net> wrote: "I placed 2nd World that year and also never received an award. Not that I really care that much but if the contest sponsor claims to have awards, they s; /archives//html/RTTY/2003-12/msg00166.html (8,930 bytes)
7. Re: [RTTY] NEW Rules for 2004 FMRE XE RTTY Contest (score: 1): Author: Waldemar DK3VN <dk3vn@nexgo.de>; Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 15:26:36 +0100; are you thinking about the famous "CQ Magazine"-??? ~:( 73 de Waldemar, DK3VN -- Check RWRL on http://home.arcor.de/waldemar.kebsch RWRL Mirror on http://www.qsl.net/dk3vn mailto:dk3vn@darc.de German; /archives//html/RTTY/2003-12/msg00168.html (8,310 bytes)
8. RE: [RTTY] NEW Rules for 2004 FMRE XE RTTY Contest (score: 1): Author: "Girts Budis" <yl2kl@apollo.lv>; Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 17:29:52 +0200; ....also CQ Magazine last MESSAGE from CQ Magasine was CQWW 160m1998 "award" and never received some plaque....... 73 YL2KL they are you thinking about the famous "CQ Magazine"-??? ~:( 73 de Waldemar; /archives//html/RTTY/2003-12/msg00171.html (9,156 bytes)
9. Re: [RTTY] NEW Rules for 2004 FMRE XE RTTY Contest (score: 1): Author: Carter Grabarczyk <k8vt@ameritech.net>; Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 17:04:45 -0500; Waldemar DK3VN wrote: Don Hill AA5AU wrote: ... Not that I really care that much but if the contest sponsor claims to have awards, they should honor their word and give the awards out in a timely man; /archives//html/RTTY/2003-12/msg00176.html (8,801 bytes)
10. Re: [RTTY] NEW Rules for 2004 FMRE XE RTTY Contest (score: 1): Author: Waldemar DK3VN <dk3vn@nexgo.de>; Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2003 14:04:47 +0100; Hi, the core of the matter is "give the awards out in a timely manner". If you receive the award/certificate much less than one year after the contest, then the majority of the HAM's are saying "rec'; /archives//html/RTTY/2003-12/msg00181.html (10,871 bytes)
11. Re: [RTTY] NEW Rules for 2004 FMRE XE RTTY Contest (score: 1): Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>; Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2004 05:14:12 -0500; "Don Hill AA5AU" <aa5au@bellsouth.net> wrote: "Note the new "2 radio" single op category. Since there is no definition of what the 2 radio category is limited to, I'm suggesting that there is no limi; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-01/msg00000.html (6,485 bytes)
12. RE: [RTTY] NEW Rules for 2004 FMRE XE RTTY Contest (score: 1): Author: "Don Hill AA5AU" <aa5au@bellsouth.net>; Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2004 09:20:29 -0600; Yes, Shelby, you are correct! The transmitter lockouts remain on for this contest! HNY, Don AA5AU "Don Hill AA5AU" <aa5au@bellsouth.net> wrote: "Note the new "2 radio" single op category. Since there; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-01/msg00008.html (7,963 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 12
Page: [1]