Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Not\s+in\s+log\s+errors\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Not\s+in\s+log\s+errors\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] Not in log errors (score: 1): Author: "John GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.org.uk>; Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 14:55:14 +0100; That's good advice and should be part of normal good operating. It doesn't help when in run mode though. My CQ gets answered by W1XYZ, I send 'W1XYZ 599 001 001 ' and most times the response will be; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-06/msg00065.html (12,957 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] Not in log errors (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>; Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 10:58:52 -0400; The problem would be resolved if the calling station would simply replace QSL with your call - GW4SKA 599 004 004 W4TV or even GW4SKA 599 004 004 TU. QSL is not needed - replacing it with even a lon; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-06/msg00068.html (13,663 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] Not in log errors (score: 1): Author: "Bob, WB2COY" <wb2coy@hotmail.com>; Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 11:44:56 -0400; What happened to the previous comments about the S&P stations beyond told "...don't send my call as part of your exchange. I already know what my callsign is!" This is from the guys who count millise; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-06/msg00071.html (7,558 bytes)
4. Re: [RTTY] Not in log errors (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>; Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 11:56:19 -0400; In this era of "working stations from the bandmap" which is full of garbage from a cluster, stations call blind without ever confirming (copying) the call of the station they are working. A station c; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-06/msg00073.html (8,194 bytes)
5. Re: [RTTY] Not in log errors (score: 1): Author: Jim Preston <jpreston1@cox.net>; Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 10:04:03 -0700; Here's another example of how NIL happens. I'm S&P in a contest where the exchange is already known, or can be done from pre-fill. W1XYZ: CQ TEST W1XYZ ME: N6VH N6VH W1XYZ: N6VH 599 [GIBBERISH] ME: ?; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-06/msg00076.html (13,068 bytes)
6. Re: [RTTY] Not in log errors (score: 1): Author: john@kk9a.com; Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 15:17:36 -0400; As a running station many times I do not copy the sent report on the first go around. Occasionally when I ask NR? NR? I get no response. After asking a couple of times and hearing nothing I do not lo; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-06/msg00079.html (8,114 bytes)
7. Re: [RTTY] Not in log errors (score: 1): Author: "John GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.org.uk>; Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 22:25:45 +0100; Perhaps it's time that contest sponsors require *both* calls as part of the exchange. 73, ... Joe, W4TV That would be good as long as it was enforced. We already have some of the high scoring statio; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-06/msg00083.html (8,450 bytes)
8. Re: [RTTY] Not in log errors (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 22:02:16 -0700; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: (may be snipped) REPLY: I can't speak for everybody, but I think they mean "Don't send my call again after we already established contact". It's especially annoying when you ask for; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-06/msg00097.html (8,215 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]