Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Not\s+to\s+beat\s+the\s+ANTENNA\s+OVERKILL\s+horse\.\.\.\s*$/: 34 ]

Total 34 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [RTTY] Not to beat the ANTENNA OVERKILL horse... (score: 1)
Author: "John Fleming" <john@wa9als.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 19:30:58 -0400
Welcome! You can count on this discussion once or twice a year. The arguments are the same, just a few new participants in the discussion each year. It's a flawed situation with no perfect answers. W
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00214.html (9,863 bytes)

22. Re: [RTTY] Not to beat the ANTENNA OVERKILL horse... (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 19:31:47 -0400
If that's your definition, "Limited Mode" should be defined as a multiband vertical (e.g., flagpole), an endfed wire or a 1/2 wave dipole/inverted V no higher than 50 feet. Anything beyond the most b
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00215.html (9,611 bytes)

23. Re: [RTTY] Not to beat the ANTENNA OVERKILL horse... (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 16:32:10 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY SEPARATOR -- So is HP/LP, SO/MO and assisted/unassisted. Shall those classes be eliminated? Bill, W6WRT _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RT
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00216.html (8,873 bytes)

24. Re: [RTTY] Not to beat the ANTENNA OVERKILL horse... (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 16:37:58 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY SEPARATOR -- Not at all. The Limited Class should be designed to attract a large number of hams who are presently non-contesters. Some hams will want to stay in that class
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00217.html (10,097 bytes)

25. Re: [RTTY] Not to beat the ANTENNA OVERKILL horse... (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 16:44:25 -0700
Absolutely. He should score high in the Unlimited Class. Is football/baseball/basketball/soccer boring because they all use the same equipment? I'll say it again: It's the close competition that make
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00218.html (9,635 bytes)

26. Re: [RTTY] Not to beat the ANTENNA OVERKILL horse... (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 20:34:16 -0400
W6WRT Write: If you are going to create a limited class, make it the lowest common denominator so that everyone has an equal chance. Otherwise you are picking winners and losers ... I would suggest t
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00220.html (9,695 bytes)

27. Re: [RTTY] Not to beat the ANTENNA OVERKILL horse... (score: 1)
Author: "Carter, K8VT" <k8vt@ameritech.net>
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 21:22:27 -0400
Joe..."liking" the guys who do SO2R is *NOT* the point. I like everybody (except when they resort to name calling and sarcasm). I think it is truly great that they [SO2R operators] have the knowledge
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00223.html (9,437 bytes)

28. Re: [RTTY] Not to beat the ANTENNA OVERKILL horse... (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 19:05:13 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY SEPARATOR -- Lowest common denominator would probably be a two meter HT. You are going at it backwards, Joe. I'm not trying to define a class which would fit all existing s
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00225.html (9,835 bytes)

29. Re: [RTTY] Not to beat the ANTENNA OVERKILL horse... (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 22:47:22 -0400
The problem with trying to define a class is you discriminate against certain techniques and attempt to draw a line in the sand. In doing so your definition of limited vs. unlimited would create a gr
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00227.html (10,033 bytes)

30. Re: [RTTY] Not to beat the ANTENNA OVERKILL horse... (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 19:57:38 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY SEPARATOR -- Of course. Low power class discriminates against amplifier owners. Unasissted discriminates against internet and/or VHF packet users. Single op discriminates a
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00229.html (9,275 bytes)

31. Re: [RTTY] Not to beat the ANTENNA OVERKILL horse... (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 23:07:25 -0400
That same top contester also says he started doing SO2R to overcome antenna disadvantages. Are you saying there isn't a 25%, 50% or more difference between the flagpole/endfed wire and stacked triba
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00230.html (10,316 bytes)

32. Re: [RTTY] Not to beat the ANTENNA OVERKILL horse... (score: 1)
Author: "Carter, K8VT" <k8vt@ameritech.net>
Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2006 12:33:12 -0400
Which is a roundabout way of admitting that there *IS* an advantage for SO2R. Well, the academic (if not practical) answer to that question is that technology keeps changing. Because as you say, it w
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00242.html (11,119 bytes)

33. Re: [RTTY] Not to beat the ANTENNA OVERKILL horse... (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2006 14:07:47 -0400
I'm not arguing that. The first two are obvious significant advantages and have been for 50 years of contesting. The High vs. Low power advantage was perhaps 100% in the early days. However, SO2R wil
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00256.html (12,343 bytes)

34. Re: [RTTY] Not to beat the ANTENNA OVERKILL horse... (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2006 11:54:11 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY SEPARATOR -- Get one thing straight, Joe: Under the classes I propose, I would be in the Unlimited class by virtue of my antenna. I would still have only one radio. I am no
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-07/msg00260.html (9,698 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu