Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Operating\s+practices\s+in\s+CQWW\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Operating\s+practices\s+in\s+CQWW\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] Operating practices in CQWW (score: 1): Author: "Phil Cooper" <pcooper@guernsey.net>; Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 18:44:58 +0100; Hi all, Just a few observations prior (and seperate) to posting my claimed score. I too noted a large number of 3 X 3 or 2 X 3 calls going on, and not all were new to the RTTY game! I can accept ther; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-09/msg00243.html (7,730 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] Operating practices in CQWW (score: 1): Author: "roofus" <roofus@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 13:57:06 -0400; Phil could you please explain your use of 3 X 3, 2 X 3, 1 X 2, and 1 X 3 calls? I just applied for a 2 X 1 call and hope that it's not a problem. Thanks, Dennis AB8NI . ______________________________; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-09/msg00244.html (7,922 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] Operating practices in CQWW (score: 1): Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>; Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 12:58:25 -0500 (CDT); Yeah, what's up with that? I'd not noticed that phenomena since I got back into RTTY contesting back in January. Quite annoying. It's as if the stations were just calling whatever callsign printed fi; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-09/msg00245.html (7,911 bytes)
4. Re: [RTTY] Operating practices in CQWW (score: 1): Author: Jim Rhodes <k0xu@iowadsl.net>; Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 13:12:46 -0500; What he means is using the calls that many times like: K0XU K0XU K0XU DE AB8NI AB8NI AB8NI Is what he means by 3 X 3 At 12:57 PM 9/27/2004, roofus wrote: Phil could you please explain your use of 3 X; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-09/msg00248.html (8,849 bytes)
5. Re: [RTTY] Operating practices in CQWW (score: 1): Author: w2nra@optonline.net; Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 14:15:04 -0400; Hi Dennis, You're talking about different animals. You're talking about callsign 2x1 their talking about calling station 3 time his call de 3 times your call, 3 X 3, etc. 73, Art ____________________; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-09/msg00249.html (8,122 bytes)
6. Re: [RTTY] Operating practices in CQWW (score: 1): Author: "roofus" <roofus@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 14:40:13 -0400; Sorry guys and now I see the error of my ways, we are talking about the exchange here not callsigns.....DUH. I haven't been the same since they took out the caffeine IV yesterday at the end on the co; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-09/msg00250.html (7,649 bytes)
7. Re: [RTTY] Operating practices in CQWW (score: 1): Author: W0YR@aol.com; Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 14:45:00 EDT; AB8NI AB8NI AB8NI de W0YR/4 W0YR/4 W0YR/4 That's a 3 X 3 So is 3DA0TYU Cheers. _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailma; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-09/msg00252.html (7,057 bytes)
8. Re: [RTTY] Operating practices in CQWW (score: 1): Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>; Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 12:18:21 -0700; On Sep 27, 2004, at 10:57 AM, roofus wrote: Phil could you please explain your use of 3 X 3, 2 X 3, 1 X 2, and 1 X 3 calls? I just applied for a 2 X 1 call and hope that it's not a problem. I think P; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-09/msg00257.html (9,798 bytes)
9. Re: [RTTY] Operating practices in CQWW (score: 1): Author: Dave Hachadorian <k6ll@juno.com>; Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 12:28:51 -0700; I usually send: carriage return DE K6LL K6LL carriage return carriage return This improves the odds that Writelog, and perhaps some other rtty programs, will highlight my callsign and make it "clicka; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-09/msg00259.html (8,509 bytes)
10. Re: [RTTY] Operating practices in CQWW (score: 1): Author: Jeff Stai <jds@twistedoak.com>; Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 12:30:23 -0700; hi Phil - First wanted to thank you for finding me during your S&P stints! Each time, you were pretty weak at my end (west US) - it took a little ESP for me to realize it was you! (It sure helps to l; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-09/msg00260.html (8,962 bytes)
11. Re: [RTTY] Operating practices in CQWW (score: 1): Author: Jeff Stai WK6I <wk6i@twistedoak.com>; Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 12:39:21 -0700; hi Phil - First wanted to thank you for finding me during your S&P stints! Each time, you were pretty weak at my end (west US) - it took a little ESP for me to realize it was you! (It sure helps to l; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-09/msg00261.html (8,828 bytes)
12. Re: [RTTY] Operating practices in CQWW (score: 1): Author: Doug Faunt N6TQS +1-510-655-8604 <faunt@panix.com>; Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 16:42:04 -0400 (EDT); I saw character strings in the noise that were probably you, but never got anything like a copyable call. If I'd been on a DXpedition, I'd have called you, though. The ones that make me laugh are the; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-09/msg00263.html (8,819 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 12
Page: [1]