Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+PACTOR\s+III\s+Start\s+Date\s+\.\.\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+PACTOR\s+III\s+Start\s+Date\s+\.\.\.\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] PACTOR III Start Date ... (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>; Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 16:48:12 -0400; Does anyone know for sure when SCS released the first PACTOR III modems and when they were first implemented in amateur service? -- 73, ... Joe, W4TV _______________________________________________ R; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00433.html (6,336 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] PACTOR III Start Date ... (score: 1): Author: Adrian Engele via RTTY <rtty@contesting.com>; Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 14:35:13 -0700 (PDT); Joe, Not sure is this helps: PACTOR Museum PACTOR Museum Here, we show you all our modem models from the beginning. View on www.scs-ptc.com Preview by Yahoo 73, Adrian AA5UK _______________________; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00434.html (8,440 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] PACTOR III Start Date ... (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>; Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 17:50:15 -0400; Thank you. It would appear that PACTOR III was introduced in May of 2002. There is no record of how quickly it moved from commercial to amateur service but we do know that it was causing enough inter; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00435.html (8,468 bytes)
4. Re: [RTTY] PACTOR III Start Date ... (score: 1): Author: Terry <ab5k@hotmail.com>; Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 17:22:18 -0500; Joe, Looks like there were also issues in 2006: In November 2006, N5RFX filed RM-11392: <http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=6519008574> RM11392 asks the FCC to re-establish the narrowband natu; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00436.html (10,824 bytes)
5. Re: [RTTY] PACTOR III Start Date ... (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>; Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 18:46:16 -0400; 2008 was when the FCC denied the N5RFX petition. So from introduction to problem was five years for PACTOR III. 73, ... Joe, W4TV Looks like there were also issues in 2006: In November 2006, N5RFX fi; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00437.html (10,923 bytes)
6. Re: [RTTY] PACTOR III Start Date ... (score: 1): Author: Neal Campbell <nealk3nc@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 18:48:20 -0400; Looking at scs-ptc.com's pages archived at archive.org, it appears that it was released somewhere between Feb-Aug 2002. If you have never used archive.org, its tremendous, it keeps snapshots of websi; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00438.html (11,814 bytes)
7. Re: [RTTY] PACTOR III Start Date ... (score: 1): Author: "Ron Kolarik" <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>; Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 20:03:03 -0500; Joe as early as Feb.2002 there was P3 activity in EU on 80m. I'll need to dig for it but it was on the PSK31 list and I think G3PLX brought up the subject related to possible PSK interference. Ron K0; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00440.html (10,303 bytes)
8. Re: [RTTY] PACTOR III Start Date ... (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>; Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 22:11:43 -0400; Ron, The SCS web site gives May 2002 but I don't doubt that the amateurs behind SCS were testing on 80 and 40 meters before then. 73, ... Joe, W4TV On 4/29/2014 9:03 PM, Ron Kolarik wrote: Joe as ear; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00442.html (10,459 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]