Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Proposed\s+\"Retro\s+RTTY\s+Contest\"\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Proposed\s+\"Retro\s+RTTY\s+Contest\"\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] Proposed "Retro RTTY Contest" (score: 1): Author: N4BE_Jim <N4BE_Jim@Yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2013 23:03:19 -0500; Computers and software just make things too easy, for softies, almost not a challenge any more. I propose a new contest for retro-only operations. They have straight key night don't they? Proposed Ru; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-12/msg00026.html (7,914 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] Proposed "Retro RTTY Contest" (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@wildblue.net>; Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2013 20:35:37 -0800; Proposed additional rules: Spark gap transmitters only. Coherer receivers only. 73, Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.conte; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-12/msg00027.html (6,654 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] Proposed "Retro RTTY Contest" (score: 1): Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>; Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2013 22:06:42 -0800; Gonna be tough to generate a frequency shift carrier with spark gaps, though However, if it is going to be true retro (pre-1956 FCC rules), you must also use 850 Hz shift. Since there are going to be; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-12/msg00028.html (7,718 bytes)
4. Re: [RTTY] Proposed "Retro RTTY Contest" (score: 1): Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@frontier.com>; Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2013 22:11:28 -0800; Hi Chen I still have some old polar relays around if you need some :-) Might have to re-adjust the range if we go to 850 shift!! 73 Tom W7WHY Gonna be tough to generate a frequency shift carrier with; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-12/msg00029.html (7,589 bytes)
5. Re: [RTTY] Proposed "Retro RTTY Contest" (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@wildblue.net>; Date: Sat, 07 Dec 2013 00:07:47 -0800; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: (may be snipped) REPLY: This is a major drawback. Perhaps we can get a waiver to use 10 MHz shift? 73, Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list R; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-12/msg00030.html (7,480 bytes)
6. Re: [RTTY] Proposed "Retro RTTY Contest" (score: 1): Author: N4BE_Jim <N4BE_Jim@Yahoo.com>; Date: Sat, 7 Dec 2013 08:09:30 -0500; Yes it could be worth something today. Retro is making a comeback it seems, for collectors. Probably a CV-89 TU? If that ever happens again call me before the landfill! Sent from my iPad ____________; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-12/msg00031.html (9,831 bytes)
7. [RTTY] Proposed "Retro RTTY Contest" (score: 1): Author: "Anthony W. DePrato" <wa4jqs@mikrotec.com>; Date: Sat, 07 Dec 2013 21:37:22 -0500; Lugged my old ASR 33 up from the basement.. have a wrecker coming tomorrow to hoist the US NAVY TU system up.. blower is only 180lbs.. found an old cq tape from 1968 also a box of used chad so i shou; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-12/msg00037.html (8,677 bytes)
8. Re: [RTTY] Proposed "Retro RTTY Contest" (score: 1): Author: Al Kozakiewicz <akozak@hourglass.com>; Date: Sat, 7 Dec 2013 21:55:45 -0500; What I remember about the KSR-33 as a computer terminal in the early 1970's was that it was anything but light; far more mechanical than electrical; and if you upended it to fit it in the trunk of a; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-12/msg00038.html (9,775 bytes)
9. Re: [RTTY] Proposed "Retro RTTY Contest" (score: 1): Author: Wa3frp <wa3frp@aol.com>; Date: Sat, 7 Dec 2013 22:11:27 -0500 (EST); Nice idea Jim, but I may be the only one to enter... My ST-6 is still in operation with 850 and 170 filters as well as my Model 28 ASR running a 60 ma current loop...It sometimes beats MMTTY and even; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-12/msg00039.html (8,776 bytes)
10. Re: [RTTY] Proposed "Retro RTTY Contest" (score: 1): Author: COURYHOUSE@aol.com; Date: Sat, 7 Dec 2013 22:52:49 -0500 (EST); when I think RTTY I always think mechanical teletypes if you are going to do it electronically on a screen you might as well just email! <grin!> Ed # KF7RWW _www.smecc.org_ (http://www.smecc.org) In; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-12/msg00040.html (9,076 bytes)
11. Re: [RTTY] Proposed "Retro RTTY Contest" (score: 1): Author: Kai <k.siwiak@ieee.org>; Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2013 00:13:43 -0500; Bill I do understand that you are joking of course, but spark-type emissions (class-B damped wave), while not legal in ham bands, are legal under Part 15, the subpart dealing with Ultra-wideband radi; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-12/msg00052.html (9,292 bytes)
12. [RTTY] Proposed "Retro RTTY Contest" (score: 1): Author: "Thomas W4HM" <w4hm@tampabay.rr.com>; Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2013 08:33:41 -0500; We can swish the VFO back and forth to create the mark and space frequency!!! 73 & GUD DX, Thomas F. Giella W4HM Lakeland, FL, USA w4hm@tampabay.rr.com W4HM's Amateur & SWL Autobiography: http://www.; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-12/msg00053.html (8,516 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 12
Page: [1]