Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+QRL\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+QRL\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] QRL? (score: 1): Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>; Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2016 10:37:15 -0700; QRL? may give the sender a warm, self-righteous feeling, but it does little to politely determine if a frequency is in use. When I hear "QRL?" on my run frequency it is almost always at a time when I; /archives//html/RTTY/2016-03/msg00273.html (9,687 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] QRL? (score: 1): Author: John <jlockj@earthlink.net>; Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2016 14:14:20 -0500; I believe sending a short QRL message is the courteous thing to do before sending a longer CQ message. There have been many times I've waited 20 seconds on a "clear" frequency before sending QRL and; /archives//html/RTTY/2016-03/msg00283.html (12,171 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] QRL? (score: 1): Author: "john@kk9a.com" <john@kk9a.com>; Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2016 10:11:22 -0400; I have never heard QRL or any other other method of asking if the frequency is in use during a RTTY contest. Usually I just get blasted with a CQ and I have to blow off the weak station that I was tr; /archives//html/RTTY/2016-03/msg00295.html (7,517 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]