Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+RITTY\s+vs\.\s+MMTTY\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+RITTY\s+vs\.\s+MMTTY\s*$/: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] RITTY vs. MMTTY (score: 1): Author: "Ed Muns" <w0yk@msn.com>; Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 11:00:55 -0700; At HC8N last weekend W6OTC and I did some minimal subjective comparison of RITTY and MMTTY simultaneously on the same signal. Most of the time, as expected, both decoders worked fine. On rare occasio; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-10/msg00071.html (8,122 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] RITTY vs. MMTTY (score: 1): Author: "Scott Schultz" <scottaschultz@juno.com>; Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 13:18:02 -0500; I noticed the same differences by using the built-in RTTY decoder on my 756Pro. As good as MMTTY is, the Pro's decoder sometimes did a better job of picking up some of the data, especially callsigns.; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-10/msg00073.html (9,243 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] RITTY vs. MMTTY (score: 1): Author: "WS7I" <ws7i@ewarg.org>; Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 11:29:51 -0700; Just a suggestion. MMTTY has several/many modes and setups, and just like a hardware terminal unit not all are for the same conditons/bands. You might experiment with some settings. ________________; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-10/msg00075.html (7,381 bytes)
4. Re: [RTTY] RITTY vs. MMTTY (score: 1): Author: Jeff Stai <jds@twistedoak.com>; Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2007 11:41:03 -0700; Yes - I noticed I made a lot more use of the "Flutter" setup in a clone window this time. Many times the main window had no print while "Flutter" got it fine. - jeff wk6i -- Jeff Stai jds@twistedoak.; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-10/msg00076.html (7,705 bytes)
5. Re: [RTTY] RITTY vs. MMTTY (score: 1): Author: "Scott Schultz" <scottaschultz@juno.com>; Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 13:44:11 -0500; I have been using MMTTY for several years and when using the program by itself, it is easy enough to switch between the different demodulator types (or the other sub-settings) in order to get the bes; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-10/msg00077.html (7,709 bytes)
6. Re: [RTTY] RITTY vs. MMTTY (score: 1): Author: "Ed Muns" <w0yk@msn.com>; Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 12:13:32 -0700; Switching between MMTTY profiles takes too long (seconds) in a contest situation, so having multiple MMTTY windows open, each with a different profile, is more useful. 73, Ed - W0YK ________________; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-10/msg00078.html (7,677 bytes)
7. Re: [RTTY] RITTY vs. MMTTY (score: 1): Author: "Alan Burgstahler" <alan-ham@comcast.net>; Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 12:24:29 -0700; Scott, there are two ways to change things in MMTTY, and they work either with MMTTY running by itself or with N1MM Logger. If you click on the "TYPE" button on the MMTTY window, it will let you chan; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-10/msg00079.html (9,978 bytes)
8. Re: [RTTY] RITTY vs. MMTTY (score: 1): Author: Terry <terry@kk6t.com>; Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2007 12:47:51 -0700; That's assuming you're set up in N1MM to use the "normal" MMTTY window rather than the "small" one. You don't have access to any buttons with the small window. 73 de Terry KK6T ______________________; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-10/msg00080.html (10,248 bytes)
9. Re: [RTTY] RITTY vs. MMTTY (score: 1): Author: Jerry Flanders <jeflanders@comcast.net>; Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2007 16:04:33 -0400; What is a good combination of profiles to set up, and what parameter settings are optimum? I have been using MMTTY for years and have NEVER figured out how to optimize all the settings that are possi; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-10/msg00081.html (7,902 bytes)
10. Re: [RTTY] RITTY vs. MMTTY (score: 1): Author: Jerry Flanders <jeflanders@comcast.net>; Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2007 16:13:39 -0400; I can confirm Scott's observation. I had a 756PRO for years and now a 756PRO3 for the last 10 months, and either of them could decode RTTY as well and often better than MMTTY/others. I keep the RTTY; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-10/msg00082.html (8,302 bytes)
11. Re: [RTTY] RITTY vs. MMTTY (score: 1): Author: Ian White GM3SEK <gm3sek@ifwtech.co.uk>; Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 21:23:24 +0100; To retain full access to the MMTTY menus and buttons, you can shrink the normal window to a small size (less than the width of the DI window). The buttons are hard to read, but are still very useful; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-10/msg00084.html (11,402 bytes)
12. [RTTY] RITTY vs. MMTTY (score: 1): Author: "Grant Bright" <gbright@bellsouth.net>; Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 17:19:32 -0400; Hello Rtty People, It was lovely to hear so MANY RTTY signals from 80m to 10m! The CQ WW contest was good from Georgia to EU, and SA. I never heard anyone from the middle east or Asia. Even 80 meters; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-10/msg00086.html (8,762 bytes)
13. Re: [RTTY] RITTY vs. MMTTY (score: 1): Author: Jerry Flanders <jeflanders@comcast.net>; Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2007 18:43:28 -0400; I listen to the sigs. Pretty easy to tell when the carrier drops. Sometimes copy is poor and hard to hear, but even then the waterfall on MMTTY shows if a sig is there or not. Jerry W4UK ____________; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-10/msg00091.html (7,963 bytes)
14. Re: [RTTY] RITTY vs. MMTTY (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>; Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2007 08:19:17 -0700; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- There is a later version of RiTTY (4.54) fixes a bug which causes RiTTY to freeze after running for 20-60 minutes or so. Getting the update from Brian will not b; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-10/msg00105.html (8,185 bytes)
15. Re: [RTTY] RITTY vs. MMTTY (score: 1): Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 13:03:34 -0700 (PDT); Use Brian's callbook (postal) address. 73 - Jim AD1C -- Jim Reisert AD1C/0, <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>, http://www.ad1c.us _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contest; /archives//html/RTTY/2007-10/msg00113.html (8,426 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 15
Page: [1]