- 21. Re: [RTTY] RM-11708 FAQ posted (score: 1)
- Author: "Ron Kolarik" <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>
- Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 22:46:48 -0600
- Kai, Sorry for the late reply, list messages are not coming through in a timely manner. I'm well aware there are no bandwidth limits currently and bandplans are only suggestions but what the ARRL is
- /archives//html/RTTY/2014-02/msg00367.html (10,798 bytes)
- 22. Re: [RTTY] RM-11708 FAQ posted (score: 1)
- Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>
- Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 21:04:15 -0800
- My understanding of outernet is that it is a receive-only "broadcast" system. An individual emergency worker will not be able to use it to transmit through, or even send an SOS (at least in its curre
- /archives//html/RTTY/2014-02/msg00368.html (8,190 bytes)
- 23. Re: [RTTY] RM-11708 FAQ posted (score: 1)
- Author: Jay WS7I <ws7ik7tj@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 06:32:34 -0800
- As fairly major users of the Digital spectrum perhaps we should get together and put together our own Band Plan anticipating the changes that no doubt will be forth coming. Perhaps its time to form a
- /archives//html/RTTY/2014-02/msg00369.html (8,021 bytes)
- 24. Re: [RTTY] RM-11708 FAQ posted (score: 1)
- Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
- Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 10:07:56 -0500
- The only change necessary to the current bandplan would be to restrict 2.8 KHz modes to 7100-7125, 14115-14125, 21125-21150 and 28125-28150. No wideband operation on 80, 30, 17, 12 due to the limited
- /archives//html/RTTY/2014-02/msg00370.html (8,583 bytes)
- 25. Re: [RTTY] RM-11708 FAQ posted (score: 1)
- Author: "Ron Kolarik" <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>
- Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 10:32:48 -0600
- Good idea Jay and timely since the ARRL has instructed the HF band planning committee to come up with something for digital mode usage by the July BOD meeting. The minutes are here <http://www.arrl.o
- /archives//html/RTTY/2014-02/msg00372.html (9,209 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu