Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+RM\-11708\s+Question\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+RM\-11708\s+Question\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] RM-11708 question (score: 1): Author: Terry <ab5k@hotmail.com>; Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2014 16:30:53 -0500; Folks, Sorry if this has been asked before but in reference the filing that the ARRL made to the FCC: http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520958815 On page 11 there is a line that says "While; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-03/msg00143.html (7,400 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] RM-11708 question (score: 1): Author: Kai <k.siwiak@ieee.org>; Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2014 18:05:49 -0400; Terry, You need to look at the "ERRATUM" filing: http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520959653 as well, where that ARRL makes a correction to their original proposal. Nothing changes in the te; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-03/msg00148.html (9,677 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] RM-11708 question (score: 1): Author: "Ron Kolarik" <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>; Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2014 17:11:10 -0500; IARU says 2.7kHz. Ron K0IDT Folks, Sorry if this has been asked before but in reference the filing that the ARRL made to the FCC: http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520958815 On page 11 there; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-03/msg00149.html (7,739 bytes)
4. Re: [RTTY] RM-11708 question (score: 1): Author: Terry <ab5k@hotmail.com>; Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2014 17:57:50 -0500; Thanks Kai, The "ERRATUM" filing makes much more sense. Terry Terry, You need to look at the "ERRATUM" filing: http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7520959653 as well, where that ARRL makes a co; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-03/msg00154.html (10,232 bytes)
5. [RTTY] RM-11708 Question (score: 1): Author: Phil Sussman <psussman@pactor.com>; Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 19:45:29 -0400; Will all of the submissions that have been made recently on RM-11708 will even be considered? In light of what I have read recently from the ARRL, objections were made that they must be discarded as; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00309.html (6,957 bytes)
6. Re: [RTTY] RM-11708 Question (score: 1): Author: Paul Stoetzer <n8hm@arrl.net>; Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 19:50:28 -0400; I don't believe they are required to not consider comments that are not timely filed, but they are certainly under no obligation to consider them (as they are with comments that are timely filed). 73; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00310.html (7,363 bytes)
7. Re: [RTTY] RM-11708 Question (score: 1): Author: Dick Flanagan <dick@k7vc.com>; Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 17:56:02 -0700; I have heard that the Engineer-In-Charge has stated that late comments will still be considered as comments. -- Dick Flanagan K7VC dick@k7vc.com 73, Paul, N8HM Will all of the submissions that have b; /archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00311.html (8,023 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]