Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+RST\s+incontests\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+RST\s+incontests\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [RTTY] RST incontests (score: 1): Author: dj3iw@web.de; Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 17:41:42 +0100 (CET); Hello, RST yes/no - there are contest programs out there that need 599 for some of their unique and extremly useful features. However what about compliance with this BARTG rule?? "US stations must us; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-03/msg00262.html (6,975 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] RST incontests (score: 1): Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>; Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 12:13:25 -0500; Hard to tell where anyone was, but I did notice that there were a number of stations signing "portable" because they don't live in their "home" district. Hope they've all applied for LoTW certs for t; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-03/msg00265.html (7,423 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]