Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+RTTY\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+RTTY\s*$/: 47 ]

Total 47 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [RTTY] rtty (score: 1): Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>; Date: Sat, 04 Oct 2008 11:27:42 -0700; Hi Jay, My humble 2 cents (my understanding at this point in time): This is not a universal problem. Some rigs have 90 dB to 100 dB of dynamic range all the way to where you tap a sound card into. If; /archives//html/RTTY/2008-10/msg00034.html (16,414 bytes)
22. Re: [RTTY] rtty (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>; Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2008 16:05:30 -0400; The problem is this is not universal and those who are using an original IC-706, FT-100, TS-140 IC-746, etc. with only a 20 KHz first IF filter simply do not understand the concept of BDR and "AGC b; /archives//html/RTTY/2008-10/msg00036.html (20,716 bytes)
23. Re: [RTTY] rtty (score: 1): Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>; Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2008 16:49:38 -0400; astute = voluntary, or involuntary expulsion of gas C'Ya, Shelby - K4WW _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listi; /archives//html/RTTY/2008-10/msg00038.html (7,142 bytes)
24. [RTTY] RTTY (score: 1): Author: "Sartwell" <sartwell@verizon.net>; Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2009 04:49:35 -0500; Seems like half of what we see in print is complaints about how the other operator made a lot of mistakes and why our scores were lower than necessary. Every entry into the contest faces the same thi; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-01/msg00115.html (6,755 bytes)
25. Re: [RTTY] RTTY (score: 1): Author: "Peter Laws" <plaws0@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 16:27:51 -0600; Absolutely!!! :-) The only thing that really bugs me (tho' not enough to take notes and send email) are the few stations that would answer a CQ with their exchange. Confusing at the very least, both; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-01/msg00149.html (7,784 bytes)
26. Re: [RTTY] RTTY (score: 1): Author: "WS7I" <ws7i@ewarg.org>; Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 14:33:03 -0800; Perhaps this one will help with your answer out of order folks: cq ru de ws7i cq ws7i 599 RI RI KI1G Macro: KI1G QSL/UR 599 WA WA WS7I QSL by him I wait .012 M/s and fire a macro cq ws7i cq Seems to; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-01/msg00150.html (8,763 bytes)
27. Re: [RTTY] RTTY (score: 1): Author: Iain MacDonnell - N6ML <ar@dseven.org>; Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2009 14:37:15 -0800; Agree with all of the above. The ones that send the exchange in response to CQ really threw me - I'd send my exchange and then wonder what they were going to do next. Some of them didn't do anything,; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-01/msg00151.html (8,168 bytes)
28. Re: [RTTY] RTTY (score: 1): Author: "Peter Laws" <plaws0@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 16:50:15 -0600; Had that problem, too! As to WS7I's comment, it wasn't the macro -- I just threw the regular exchange macro at them -- it was as N6ML describes they didn't always QSL! Out of 394 Qs, though, I don't; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-01/msg00152.html (7,658 bytes)
29. Re: [RTTY] RTTY (score: 1): Author: "Ron Kolarik" <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>; Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 22:37:30 -0600; I just keep sending my normal response macro AFTER the QSL from the other station. It sometimes takes a few go rounds but very effective in giving the other station a gentle nudge in the right direct; /archives//html/RTTY/2009-01/msg00196.html (11,128 bytes)
30. [RTTY] RTTY (score: 1): Author: Phil Sussman <psussman@pactor.com>; Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 11:40:44 -0400; Dan, I agree with John .. stick with it. Everyone has disagreements now and then. However, a through discussion includes everyone -- including those with whom we strongly disagree. Frankly posts by D; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-06/msg00327.html (11,741 bytes)
31. Re: [RTTY] RTTY (score: 1): Author: "Gary AL9A" <al9a@mtaonline.net>; Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 09:48:20 -0800; Hi Hank, Likewise, thanks for the Q's in the contest. Thanks also for commenting that my RTTY seems slow - it seems that way to me too! Unfortunately, I am at a loss to figure out what the true speed; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-03/msg00267.html (8,033 bytes)
32. Re: [RTTY] RTTY (score: 1): Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>; Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 11:39:27 -0700; Gary, I did not listen to the contest this time. The next time you operate a contest, please send me an email ahead of time and I will try to make time to record and analyze what could be wrong. The; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-03/msg00273.html (8,553 bytes)
33. Re: [RTTY] RTTY (score: 1): Author: Hank Garretson <w6sx@arrl.net>; Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 18:58:57 +0000; Changing the number of stop bits will change the WPM (without changing the That could have been it. This is possible, but I don't think it's what I heard. The rhythm was noticeably off. I think the r; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-03/msg00274.html (8,165 bytes)
34. Re: [RTTY] RTTY (score: 1): Author: "Gary AL9A" <al9a@mtaonline.net>; Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 12:21:31 -0800; Wow, there sure are a bunch of guys out there with answers! I omitted one thing from my RTTY setup, but that didn't stop the correct answer from coming through anyway. In addition to WriteLog and MMT; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-03/msg00278.html (12,532 bytes)
35. Re: [RTTY] RTTY (score: 1): Author: John Merrill <johnn1jm@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 13:43:15 -0700; Now we will not be able to recognize you without your call :-). _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-03/msg00280.html (14,061 bytes)
36. Re: [RTTY] RTTY (score: 1): Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>; Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 16:16:22 -0700; Wow, some programs are really slow enough that they cannot keep up? (Remember, all you need to do is to keep up with the RTTY character rate, not the bit rate.) I remember when I encountered the FSK; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-03/msg00293.html (10,664 bytes)
37. Re: [RTTY] RTTY (score: 1): Author: "Don Hill AA5AU" <aa5au@bellsouth.net>; Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 18:17:03 -0500; Look in the TX tab of MMTTY Setup and check the sliders for Character wait and Diddle wait. They should be all the way to the left. Not 100% sure but I think adjusting these to the right makes your R; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-03/msg00294.html (9,764 bytes)
38. Re: [RTTY] RTTY (score: 1): Author: Ktfrog007@aol.com; Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 19:51:15 -0400 (EDT); Hi Don, What is the effect of the sound card clock adjustment? Is it related to speed issues?See Calibrate the Sound Card in the Help file and the Misc tab in MMTTY setup. I've never understood what; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-03/msg00297.html (7,504 bytes)
39. Re: [RTTY] RTTY (score: 1): Author: Al Kozakiewicz <akozak@hourglass.com>; Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 20:10:32 -0400; Nothing as far as data transmission/reception is concerned. With ansynchronous communications. you need a clock at each end running at (in the case of 45.5 baud, close to) the same frequency. The le; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-03/msg00299.html (8,843 bytes)
40. Re: [RTTY] RTTY (score: 1): Author: "Don Hill AA5AU" <aa5au@bellsouth.net>; Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 20:07:15 -0500; In MMTTY, there is both a "Character wait" and "Diddle wait" which make your transmission go out slower. In the TX tab of MMTTY Setup, there is a check box for "Disable Wait". If it is not checked, t; /archives//html/RTTY/2011-03/msg00300.html (11,070 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3]