Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+RTTY\s+Filters\:\s+250hz\s+vs\.\s+500hz\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+RTTY\s+Filters\:\s+250hz\s+vs\.\s+500hz\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] RTTY Filters: 250hz vs. 500hz (score: 1): Author: RLVZ@aol.com; Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 14:48:12 -0400 (EDT); Hi Guys, After participating in dozens of RTTY contests and using different radios, my layman opinion is that "not all radios and crystal filters are created equal". Further, some hams are comfortabl; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-08/msg00103.html (17,803 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Filters: 250hz vs. 500hz (score: 1): Author: Kai <k.siwiak@ieee.org>; Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 14:59:53 -0400; Yes this is good practical advise. Remember also that whether you employ a 300, 500 Hz or even 2.8 kHz filter in the radio, the FINAL filtering is software-implemented in your RTTY demodulator softwa; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-08/msg00104.html (20,484 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]