Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+RTTY\s+Growth\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+RTTY\s+Growth\s*$/: 27 ]

Total 27 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] RTTY Growth (score: 1): Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>; Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 05:37:05 -0500; http://www.arrl.org/news/stories/2004/02/18/2/?nc=1 "The largest changes really came from two events: RTTY" Just part of the article, to peak y'all interest! C'Ya, Shelby ____________________________; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-02/msg00259.html (6,262 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Growth (score: 1): Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>; Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 09:05:28 -0600 (CST); -2.8% overall (with several bright spots, esp RTTY!). I don't know about other folks that don't submit, but since the ARRL stopped publishing contest results, I lost my incentive to take the time to; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-02/msg00262.html (7,484 bytes)
3. RE: [RTTY] RTTY Growth (score: 1): Author: "J. Edward (Ed) Muns" <w0yk@msn.com>; Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 08:25:53 -0800; This is a frequent comment about the ARRL's change of moving contest results from QST to the web. I certainly understand the de-motivation to submit a log if your results aren't going to be publishe; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-02/msg00263.html (8,659 bytes)
4. RE: [RTTY] RTTY Growth (score: 1): Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>; Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 10:44:31 -0600 (CST); As one who has been on the net for as long as I've been a ham (13 years this summer), which is just a little longer than I've been in the IT biz, I don't *want* to have to go to the web just to see t; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-02/msg00264.html (7,859 bytes)
5. RE: [RTTY] RTTY Growth (score: 1): Author: "Vern" <w9hly@decaturnet.com>; Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 13:37:33 -0500; Also a life member. Rather review contest results in the magazine. W9HLY _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/lis; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-02/msg00265.html (6,976 bytes)
6. RE: [RTTY] RTTY Growth (score: 1): Author: Jay <ws7i@ewarg.org>; Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 01:28:16 +0000; In fifty years there certainly will not be any library's. Any that there are certainly won't have QST's in binders anymore. So you will look them up on some sort of electronic media in any case in 50; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-02/msg00272.html (8,262 bytes)
7. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Growth (score: 1): Author: dj3iw@t-online.de (DJ3IW Goetz); Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 11:25:33 -0000; You mean "they" will throw away all those billions of books? You must be kidding. And in 50 years the CDs will be nothing but rotten plastic that nobody can read any more. I sure prefer the ease of r; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-02/msg00275.html (9,573 bytes)
8. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Growth (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <wrt@dslextreme.com>; Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 07:57:32 -0800; _________________________________________________________ Sure there will. Where else would you go to look up the spelling of "libraries"? :-) -- 73, Bill W6WRT (a part-time librarian) QSLs via LoTW; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-02/msg00277.html (7,928 bytes)
9. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Growth (score: 1): Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>; Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 12:22:32 -0800; On Feb 21, 2004, at 7:57 AM, Bill Turner wrote: Sure there will. Where else would you go to look up the spelling of "libraries"? :-) The last time that I stepped foot into a real library building mus; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-02/msg00279.html (7,952 bytes)
10. RE: [RTTY] RTTY Growth (score: 1): Author: "Bob Wanderer" <aa0cy@QUADNET.NET>; Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 17:05:53 -0500; I'm probably doing something incorrectly, but the last time I tried to get the contest results from the Web, I could only get them by category. Granted I'm usually interested in how I did relative to; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-02/msg00280.html (10,125 bytes)
11. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Growth (score: 1): Author: ka3hsw@earthlink.net; Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 16:50:30 -0600; I thought it was Al Gore........... 73 de KA3HSW _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-02/msg00281.html (7,790 bytes)
12. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Growth (score: 1): Author: Waldemar DK3VN <dk3vn@nexgo.de>; Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 23:03:21 +0100; Hi Chen, hmmm .. glad to read that you know, who knows, were the WWW was developed! ~:) But that was not one, it was about two decades ago, when the people at CERN came up with the WWW in Europe! We; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-02/msg00293.html (9,545 bytes)
13. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Growth (score: 1): Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>; Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 16:47:33 -0600 (CST); Siemens is well known ... for recently "offshoring" 15,000 software jobs to VU. :-( I wonder if Tim Berners-Lee was a ham? -- 73, Peter Laws N5UWY/9 _______________________________________________ RT; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-02/msg00294.html (8,223 bytes)
14. RE: [RTTY] RTTY Growth (score: 1): Author: "Richard W. Solomon" <w1ksz@earthlink.net>; Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 18:25:09 -0500; It's a cut-throat world out their. The "bean-counters" are taking over. Just remember though, Loyalty went out the window when the Dodgers traded Steve Garvey !! 73, Dick, W1KSZ Siemens is well known; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-02/msg00295.html (8,827 bytes)
15. RE: [RTTY] RTTY Growth (score: 1): Author: <ei2fs@oceanfree.net>; Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 03:08:44 -0000; Hello to Waldermar DK3VN It is nice to see other Siemens people are Hams! There are only 2 of us (as far as I know) in Siemens Ireland. I have a question for you - is it possible to go in to the Ham; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-02/msg00320.html (10,314 bytes)
16. [RTTY] RTTY Growth (score: 1): Author: "Scott Nichols" <snichols@mvosprey.com>; Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 11:43:26 -0400; Interesting to note the growth in RTTY Contesting over the last 9 years...Was looking at results from prior WPX RTTY Contests this morning (http://www.rttycontesting.com/results.htm)...Winning score; /archives//html/RTTY/2005-02/msg00119.html (6,555 bytes)
17. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Growth (score: 1): Author: "Bill Turner" <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>; Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 08:15:34 -0800; It is indeed good to see. I started RTTY contesting almost by accident in the early '90s and nowdays it is almost all I do on the air, save for chasing those elusive last 11 countries. I think the ma; /archives//html/RTTY/2005-02/msg00121.html (8,146 bytes)
18. [RTTY] RTTY Growth (score: 1): Author: <jduerbusch@charter.net>; Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 10:48:22 -0600; I have been on RTTY since 1975 and been in most of the contest since then. There are 3 things that contributed to the growth as I see it: 1..Top honor go's to the ARRL making RTTY (Digital) an endors; /archives//html/RTTY/2005-02/msg00122.html (7,113 bytes)
19. [RTTY] RTTY Growth (score: 1): Author: Mike <k4gmh@arrl.net>; Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 20:47:48 -0500; Hello, Back in 1976, Ed, W3EKT, and I put together a paper for the 1976 ARRL DX Technical Symposium titled "Some Comments on RTTY DXing". In it we estimated that less than 1 percent of the amateur po; /archives//html/RTTY/2005-02/msg00189.html (7,596 bytes)
20. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Growth (score: 1): Author: Jerry Flanders <jeflanders@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 02:09:28 +0000; I was operating RTTY from maybe '72 and never had any problem finding somebody on the bands, so I would have guessed there was more activity than that. Probably not much contesting. Lots of picture f; /archives//html/RTTY/2005-02/msg00190.html (8,934 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]