Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+RTTY\s+Growth\s*$/: 27 ]

Total 27 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Growth (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>
Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 18:48:59 -0800
Jerry wrote: I was operating RTTY from maybe '72 and never had any problem finding somebody on the bands, I remember back in the 50's we called "CQ RTTY" on CW and if someone came back to you, then y
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-02/msg00195.html (7,441 bytes)

22. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Growth (score: 1)
Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>
Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 19:06:35 -0800
On Feb 13, 2005, at 6:09 PM, Jerry Flanders wrote: IIRC, we were not allowed to use FSK until just a few years prior. RTTY didn't work well with on-off mark keying only. What a segway... :-) Early Sa
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-02/msg00196.html (8,325 bytes)

23. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Growth (score: 1)
Author: Neal Campbell and Sarah Ferrell <k3nc@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 22:34:58 -0500
For sure, WF1B's software brought us into the big leagues, then Writelog, RITTY and MMTTY made software great enough that almost anyone can join with a few hours notice. The other person who has brou
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-02/msg00197.html (9,096 bytes)

24. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Growth (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>
Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 20:15:05 -0800
From: "Jerry Flanders If we had FSK in the '50's I guess I am completely wrong about the early guys using On-Off Keying with the mark tone. Don't know what I was thinking about. Jerry W4UK Hi Jerry W
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-02/msg00199.html (8,350 bytes)

25. RE: [RTTY] RTTY Growth (score: 1)
Author: "Bob VanFossen" <k4djg@shentel.net>
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 08:29:55 -0500
Speaking of Don AA5AU, it was a real blast having him respond to MY CQ instead of the other way around. Bob K4DJG _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-02/msg00204.html (7,819 bytes)

26. RE: [RTTY] RTTY Growth (score: 1)
Author: "Don Hill AA5AU" <aa5au@bellsouth.net>
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 14:10:45 -0600
contest! Had to laugh when I read this one. This is very true! Neal has exposed the reason for my RTTY madness. I figured if I helped everyone, everyone would work me in the contests and I'd get high
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-02/msg00225.html (8,110 bytes)

27. RE: [RTTY] RTTY Growth (score: 1)
Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 22:09:39 -0500
At 08:29 AM 2/14/2005, Bob VanFossen wrote: Speaking of Don AA5AU, it was a real blast having him respond to MY CQ instead of the other way around. That's the magic of Don's So2R setup. - Jim -- Jim
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-02/msg00247.html (8,505 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu