Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+RTTY\s+Rnd\s+Up\s+LCR\'s\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+RTTY\s+Rnd\s+Up\s+LCR\'s\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] RTTY Rnd Up LCR's (score: 1): Author: n5zm@arrl.net (Earl); Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2002 19:06:50 -0500; Round Up LCR's now on members only page. With results on 2002 Contest page Earl -- Earl F. Smith - N5ZM PO Box 20065 White Hall, AR 71612-0065; /archives//html/RTTY/2002-07/msg00339.html (7,044 bytes)
2. [RTTY] RTTY Rnd Up LCR's (score: 1): Author: aa5au@bellsouth.net (Don Hill AA5AU); Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2002 22:47:29 -0500; Thanks Earl! I didn't know what an LCR was 'til I looked on the site. LCR (log checking report) is like UBN (whatever that means). They are PDC (pretty darn cool) IUAM (if you ask me)! Interesting ab; /archives//html/RTTY/2002-07/msg00340.html (8,588 bytes)
3. [RTTY] RTTY Rnd Up LCR's (score: 1): Author: sdyer@interlogue.com (Steve Dyer); Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2002 21:22:21 -0700; Unique means you are the only log that was submitted with the call in question. They are are not removed if the callsign is valid. The call in question is checked against a database (e.g. FCC) of all; /archives//html/RTTY/2002-07/msg00341.html (9,455 bytes)
4. [RTTY] RTTY Rnd Up LCR's (score: 1): Author: faunt@panix.com (Doug Faunt N6TQS +1-510-655-8604); Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2002 02:07:32 -0400 (EDT); I just looked at mine, and I find that I'm not in AA4NC's log 3 times. That looks a little fishy to me. Anyone else? 73, doug Interesting about not being in AA4NC's log twice though! What happened?; /archives//html/RTTY/2002-07/msg00342.html (7,473 bytes)
5. [RTTY] RTTY Rnd Up LCR's (score: 1): Author: dk3vn@nexgo.de (Waldemar DK3VN); Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2002 08:38:28 +0200; 7 out of 1515 is nearly a half percent and not fifty micro percent. Don't worry, your "little" mistake is the "Worldcom-Phenomena" ~:) 73 de Waldemar, DK3VN -- Check RWRL on http://www.qsl.net/dk3vn; /archives//html/RTTY/2002-07/msg00343.html (7,734 bytes)
6. [RTTY] RTTY Rnd Up LCR's (score: 1): Author: wx4tm@mindspring.com (Tom Moore); Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2002 05:29:00 -0500; I wasn't in his (AA4NC) log 3 times either... wonder how many more weren't in his log?? To: <rtty@contesting.com> happened?; /archives//html/RTTY/2002-07/msg00345.html (8,249 bytes)
7. [RTTY] RTTY Rnd Up LCR's (score: 1): Author: k4ww@arrl.net (Shelby Summerville); Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2002 06:45:26 -0400; "Don Hill AA5AU" <aa5au@bellsouth.net> wrote: "Interesting about not being in AA4NC's log twice though! What happened? I lost 7 QSO's out of a total of 1515. All 7 QSO's were NIL (not in log)." SHNIA; /archives//html/RTTY/2002-07/msg00347.html (7,873 bytes)
8. Fw: [RTTY] RTTY Rnd Up LCR's (score: 1): Author: ve3tvb@sympatico.ca (Danial Sloane); Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2002 07:23:04 -0400; log)." help; /archives//html/RTTY/2002-07/msg00350.html (8,447 bytes)
9. Fw: [RTTY] RTTY Rnd Up LCR's (score: 1): Author: w9hly@decaturnet.com (Vern); Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2002 09:27:44 -0500; I had two of AA4NC entries rejected. Was his clock off? Vern; /archives//html/RTTY/2002-07/msg00362.html (9,028 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]