Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+RTTY\s+WAS\s+\#410\?\?\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] RTTY WAS #410?? (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 10:27:59 -0500
I know we've discussed this before ... I just got my RTTY WAS in the mail 2 minutes ago. Am I really only the 410th recipient? The certificate also has "DIGITAL" printed above the big WAS letters (ra
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-07/msg00237.html (7,326 bytes)

2. Re: [RTTY] RTTY WAS #410?? (score: 1)
Author: "Dave W7DPW" <w7dpw@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 08:31:24 -0700
Peter, Looks good to me and congratulations. My RTTY was is # 352 9 March 2001. Dave W7DPW result? _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.c
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-07/msg00238.html (8,129 bytes)

3. Re: [RTTY] RTTY WAS #410?? (score: 1)
Author: George K3GP <k3gp@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 15:46:58 +0000
Peter: Congrats! That looks about right - mine was RTTY #402 issued 14-Oct-04; It also has DIGITAL printed above WAS. Looks like about 1 new RTTY WAS per month lately. -- 333-3333, George K3GP Web Si
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-07/msg00239.html (7,071 bytes)

4. Re: [RTTY] RTTY WAS #410?? (score: 1)
Author: "DJ3IW Goetz" <dj3iw@t-online.de>
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 17:37:42 -0000
Could be correct Peter, mine shows #387, dated 5-Nov-03. 73 de Goetz dj3iw@t-online.de -- Original Message -- From: "Peter Laws" <plaws0@gmail.com> To: <rtty@contesting.com> Sent: Friday, July 29, 20
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-07/msg00240.html (7,441 bytes)

5. Re: [RTTY] RTTY WAS #410?? (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 13:35:12 -0500
Thanks to all that replied. I know there were some tech glitches in the recent past which caused some certificates having to be reissues. The ARRL has changed the WAS program in subtle ways tho' I co
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-07/msg00241.html (7,977 bytes)

6. Re: [RTTY] RTTY WAS #410?? (score: 1)
Author: "Barry " <w2up@mindspring.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 18:36:19 -0000
I had the same bit of surprise when I got #170 in 1991. Barry W2UP -- Barry Kutner, W2UP Internet: w2up@mindspring.com Newtown, PA Frankford Radio Club _______________________________________________
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-07/msg00242.html (8,071 bytes)

7. Re: [RTTY] RTTY WAS #410?? (score: 1)
Author: "JOHN DOBSON" <w8wej@citynet.net>
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 00:28:18 -0000
_______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-07/msg00243.html (8,452 bytes)

8. Re: [RTTY] RTTY WAS #410?? (score: 1)
Author: "F.R. Ashley" <gdadx2@earthlink.net>
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 17:37:19 -0400
Peter, My RTTY WAS is # 279, dated 12 November 1996. So, it apparently took almost 9 years for it to reach #410. Congrats on your acheivement! 73 Buddy, WB4M PS: Mine does not say "digital" _________
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-07/msg00244.html (8,860 bytes)

9. Re: [RTTY] RTTY WAS #410?? (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 20:48:01 -0700
_________________________________________________ During a major RTTY contest I and many others have worked all 50 states in a single weekend, many times. Getting the cards is the hard part. :-) Bill
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-07/msg00245.html (7,635 bytes)

10. Re: [RTTY] RTTY WAS #410?? (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 08:57:00 -0500
Ain't that the truth! I had them all worked between RTTY Roundup and Field Day last year ... DIdn't get the last card until May of this year, and that was after (in some cases) multiple SASEs and ema
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-07/msg00246.html (8,489 bytes)

11. Re: [RTTY] RTTY WAS #410?? (score: 1)
Author: "Bob VanFossen" <k4djg@shentel.net>
Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 10:22:33 -0400
I'm still looking for Delaware and Alaska! I QSL all who request it, and upload all to Logbook of the world and E-QSL. Wish everyone did, and it's free till you use it! Bob, K4DJG ___________________
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-07/msg00247.html (7,579 bytes)

12. Re: [RTTY] RTTY WAS #410?? (score: 1)
Author: Russmill47@aol.com
Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 11:06:52 EDT
I expect that it will be easier once LoTW is available for WAS. I have lots worked for WAS RTTY but very few confirmed except via LoTW. I understand that WAS via LoTW may be available by the end of 2
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-07/msg00248.html (7,912 bytes)

13. Re: [RTTY] RTTY WAS #410?? (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 10:19:14 -0500
I'd rather have, or send, a card than get (or send) a byte. -- Peter Laws | N5UWY/9 | plaws0 gmail _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.c
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-07/msg00249.html (8,070 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu