- 1. [RTTY] RTTY contesting on 160 meters (score: 1)
- Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>
- Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2009 07:53:41 -0700
- I just saw this quote buried at the bottom of a forwarded E-mail message: I think that says it all. 73 - Jim AD1C
- /archives//html/RTTY/2009-11/msg00024.html (6,547 bytes)
- 2. Re: [RTTY] RTTY contesting on 160 meters (score: 1)
- Author: "Inbody, Don" <don@inbody.net>
- Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 15:19:20 -0500
- So...does that imply that other bands are NOT serious? Hmmmm I just saw this quote buried at the bottom of a forwarded E-mail message: I think that says it all. 73 - Jim AD1C __________ Information f
- /archives//html/RTTY/2009-11/msg00025.html (8,534 bytes)
- 3. Re: [RTTY] RTTY contesting on 160 meters (score: 1)
- Author: "W5CPT" <w5cpt@bellsouth.net>
- Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 14:24:25 -0600
- I think 6M gets silly sometimes. Clint - W5CPT So...does that imply that other bands are NOT serious? Hmmmm I just saw this quote buried at the bottom of a forwarded E-mail message: I think that says
- /archives//html/RTTY/2009-11/msg00026.html (8,547 bytes)
- 4. Re: [RTTY] RTTY contesting on 160 meters (score: 1)
- Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
- Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:59:36 -0800
- ORIGINAL MESSAGE: REPLY: Agreed. Anyone who goes to the trouble of erecting a decent 160 meter antenna qualifies, I'd say. Quite different from slapping up a 2 meter J-pole. 73, Bill W6WRT __________
- /archives//html/RTTY/2009-11/msg00027.html (7,928 bytes)
- 5. Re: [RTTY] RTTY contesting on 160 meters (score: 1)
- Author: "Inbody, Don" <don@inbody.net>
- Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 16:55:11 -0500
- Well, I can agree to that...putting up a 160m antenna is no laughing matter. ORIGINAL MESSAGE: REPLY: Agreed. Anyone who goes to the trouble of erecting a decent 160 meter antenna qualifies, I'd say.
- /archives//html/RTTY/2009-11/msg00030.html (8,894 bytes)
- 6. [RTTY] RTTY contesting on 160 meters (score: 1)
- Author: "Thomas F. Giella NZ4O" <nz4o@tampabay.rr.com>
- Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 17:13:10 -0500
- Hey Don you read my mind. 80-6 meters are not serious bands, RTTY is not as serious mode and RTTY contesting on 160 meters is disrespectful. Some of my fellow RTTY contesters think in unusual ways?!
- /archives//html/RTTY/2009-11/msg00031.html (8,135 bytes)
- 7. Re: [RTTY] RTTY contesting on 160 meters (score: 1)
- Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
- Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 17:23:59 -0500
- "Well, I can agree to that...putting up a 160m antenna is no laughing matter." Maybe not, but I've had many that laughed at my ability to "not hear", on 160. C'Ya, Shelby - K4WW _____________________
- /archives//html/RTTY/2009-11/msg00032.html (7,725 bytes)
- 8. Re: [RTTY] RTTY contesting on 160 meters (score: 1)
- Author: Andrei Stchislenok <asnp3d@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 20:31:18 -0500
- Also, Does it mean that if NP3D is operating RTTY on 160 meters, he disrespect 160 meters?? I dont think so... -- 73's Andrei EW1AR-NP3D -- DXCC RTTY via LoTW only Who has what? - World Wide Rating P
- /archives//html/RTTY/2009-11/msg00033.html (8,605 bytes)
- 9. Re: [RTTY] RTTY contesting on 160 meters (score: 1)
- Author: David VE3VID <ve3vid@hotmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 23:36:18 -0500
- Is a dipole at 60ft serious enough for 160m :) _________________________________________________________________ CDN College or University student? Get Windows 7 for only $39.99 before Jan 3! Buy it
- /archives//html/RTTY/2009-11/msg00034.html (9,481 bytes)
- 10. Re: [RTTY] RTTY contesting on 160 meters (score: 1)
- Author: David VE3VID <ve3vid@hotmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 23:52:02 -0500
- serious _________________________________________________________________ Lots of fantastic Windows 7 offers, in one convenient place. Get the perfect deal for you now. http://go.microsoft.com/?link
- /archives//html/RTTY/2009-11/msg00035.html (9,363 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu