- 1. [RTTY] RTTY length and macros (score: 1)
- Author: Phil Florig <W9IXX@arrl.net>
- Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 18:30:26 -0400
- Hi all, Have some really good comments and suggestions so far. Below are a few examples that I made up for exchanges for different conditions based on these comments. Tnx so far to Dave K2YG, Mark N7
- /archives//html/RTTY/2005-04/msg00073.html (10,247 bytes)
- 2. Re: [RTTY] RTTY length and macros (score: 1)
- Author: Phil Florig <W9IXX@arrl.net>
- Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 19:54:25 -0400
- Hi Bill, Nice to hear from you again. Another couple of good ideas. Sometimes they only understand "only"... HI.. Another good point and noticed that on cw at Swains KH8SI when I was there. Started d
- /archives//html/RTTY/2005-04/msg00074.html (10,014 bytes)
- 3. Re: [RTTY] RTTY length and macros (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
- Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 08:55:22 -0700
- I would also suggest not using the "K" and "BK" at the end of the transmission. They are useful for CW but have no value for RTTY. Being a continuous carrier mode, when the RTTY carrier drops it is o
- /archives//html/RTTY/2005-04/msg00080.html (7,505 bytes)
- 4. Re: [RTTY] RTTY length and macros (score: 1)
- Author: WI8W <rtty@wi8w.org>
- Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 16:02:21 +0000
- Bill, Not adding K or BK to end of messages sounds like a good idea but it would not work for me. I find the carrier signal somewhat annoying so I keep the sound turned off both on transmit and recei
- /archives//html/RTTY/2005-04/msg00084.html (7,224 bytes)
- 5. Re: [RTTY] RTTY length and macros (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
- Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 19:11:57 -0700
- What!! The most beautiful sound in the radio spectrum you find annoying??? You'll have to excuse me for a moment while I regain my composure. Whew! That was a shocker! -- 73, Bill W6WRT _____________
- /archives//html/RTTY/2005-04/msg00089.html (8,256 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu