Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+RTTY\s+on\s+160\s+Meters\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+RTTY\s+on\s+160\s+Meters\s*$/: 16 ]

Total 16 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [RTTY] RTTY on 160 Meters (score: 1): Author: "Dick Kriss, AA5VU" <aa5vu@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 09:43:22 -0600; It never occurred to me listen for PSK or RTTY in that portion of the band. The few RTTY or PSK signals I have heard are between 1.807 to 1.810 MHz The OPEN UKRAINE RTTY CHAMPIONSHIP'2006 is the fir; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00391.html (7,073 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] RTTY on 160 Meters (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>; Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 07:59:46 -0800; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Very true and that's a shame. 160 is a great band for up to a few hundred miles easily and more with some power and big antennas. B; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00393.html (7,054 bytes)
3. [RTTY] RTTY on 160 Meters (score: 1): Author: "Thomas Giella KN4LF" <flcyclone@tampabay.rr.com>; Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 12:32:46 -0500; I've been encouraging digital modes operation for about four years including RTTY between 1800-1810 kc, the segment that the ARRL recommends in it's voluntary band plan. There is a fair amount of PSK; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00395.html (8,626 bytes)
4. Re: [RTTY] RTTY on 160 Meters (score: 1): Author: <ke4qok@bellsouth.net>; Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 14:19:55 -0500; It may not be as hard as you think to maintain a good QSO count on 160M. There are probably a lot of people out there that have few if any RTTY contacts on this band and would like to get some in the; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00399.html (9,736 bytes)
5. Re: [RTTY] RTTY on 160 Meters (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>; Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 12:51:44 -0800; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Especially if someone spots you. :-) 73, Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesti; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00401.html (7,519 bytes)
6. Re: [RTTY] RTTY on 160 Meters (score: 1): Author: "Thomas Giella KN4LF" <flcyclone@tampabay.rr.com>; Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 23:07:25 -0500; Hi Don et all, Yes let's do some RTTY on Friday and/or Saturday evening beginning around 0000-0100 UTC on 1808 kc LSB +/- QRM. I have a full sized inverted L and 600 watts so I can work all 50 states; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00416.html (10,807 bytes)
7. Re: [RTTY] RTTY on 160 Meters (score: 1): Author: "Andy swiffin" <a.l.swiffin@dundee.ac.uk>; Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 10:19:27 +0000; 28/02/2006 04:07:25: an Jings - you guys miss the point quickly!! If you go on to 1808 we can't come out to play. We aren't allowed below 1810. Our IARU bandplan puts digital 1838 to 1842 where we c; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00428.html (8,221 bytes)
8. Re: [RTTY] RTTY on 160 Meters (score: 1): Author: John Becker <w0jab@big-river.net>; Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 09:15:38 -0600; Andy has a very good point. If we want to play with them we are going have to do it between 1838 and 1842. Ray Charles could see this. John, W0JAB _______________________________________________ RTTY; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00431.html (9,481 bytes)
9. Re: [RTTY] RTTY on 160 Meters (score: 1): Author: "Andy swiffin" <a.l.swiffin@dundee.ac.uk>; Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 10:41:16 +0000; 28/02/2006 04:07:25: an Jings - you guys miss the point quickly!! If you go on to 1808 we can't come out to play. We aren't allowed below 1810. Our IARU bandplan puts digital 1838 to 1842 where we c; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00432.html (8,404 bytes)
10. Re: [RTTY] RTTY on 160 Meters (score: 1): Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>; Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 11:41:28 -0500; "Andy has a very good point. If we want to play with them we are going have to do it between 1838 and 1842." Personally, I believe, that US stations operating RTTY, between 1838-1842, are only asking; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00433.html (9,320 bytes)
11. Re: [RTTY] RTTY on 160 Meters (score: 1): Author: Ed <k4sb@bellsouth.net>; Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 17:19:40 +0000; John Becker wrote: Andy has a very good point. If we want to play with them we are going have to do it between 1838 and 1842. Ray Charles could see this. John, W0JAB -- Unfortunately, Ray Charles doe; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00435.html (7,860 bytes)
12. [RTTY] RTTY on 160 Meters (score: 1): Author: "Thomas Giella KN4LF" <flcyclone@tampabay.rr.com>; Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 18:05:12 -0500; Andy, How about 1811 kc instead of 1808 kc? If not we can certainly operate RTTY between between 1838 kc +/- QRM. I already work European stations on PSK31 on that frequency and we are also trying on; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00437.html (9,164 bytes)
13. Re: [RTTY] RTTY on 160 Meters (score: 1): Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>; Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2006 22:57:02 -0500; Problem with RTTY operation on 160m has to do with multi-path propagation causing inter-symbol interference. It's the same reason why 300 baud packet works on 20m, but not on 80m. Reducing the symbol; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-03/msg00220.html (7,357 bytes)
14. Re: [RTTY] RTTY on 160 Meters (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>; Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 08:17:22 -0800; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: ** REPLY SEPARATOR ** True, but there are two fixes for that: 1. Reduce the shift to something like 23 Hz. or 2. Ignore it and work 'em anyway. Bill, W6WRT _________________________; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-03/msg00222.html (6,954 bytes)
15. Re: [RTTY] RTTY on 160 Meters (score: 1): Author: Dick Kriss <aa5vu@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 12:58:29 -0500; Wayne, TNX for the 160 RTTY QSO on 19-April-98 at 1149z on 1.808 Mhz. I will QSL via LoTW at the end of the month. 73 Dick AA5VU _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTT; /archives//html/RTTY/2008-04/msg00131.html (6,478 bytes)
16. Re: [RTTY] RTTY on 160 Meters (score: 1): Author: "Andrei Stchislenok" <asnp3d@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 23:38:14 -0400; I will try to be on 1808.0 abt 1100Z in the morning on RTTY. Had six nice RTTY QSO's tonight. 73's Andrei NP3D -- 73's Andrei EW1AR-NP3D WAS RTTY #455 from NY(all via LoTW) WAS RTTY #549 from MA (all; /archives//html/RTTY/2008-04/msg00139.html (8,094 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 16
Page: [1]