Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+RU\s+macros\s+\-\s+my\s+views\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] RU macros - my views (score: 1)
Author: " pcooper" <pcooper@guernsey.net>
Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2015 11:03:16 -0800
Hi all, Well, apart from suffering several bouts of severe giddiness during the contest when I had to sleep it off, there were some very unusual macros being used. Mainly (I guess) from folk new to R
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-01/msg00035.html (6,999 bytes)

2. Re: [RTTY] RU macros - my views (score: 1)
Author: iw1ayd - Salvatore Irato <iw1ayd@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2015 17:58:23 +0100
Hi all. Phil you are absolutely and undoubtedly right. Let me and us smile a little bit around it. As it seems that having had on hands all that best practices paper about RTTY & Contesting leave a l
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-01/msg00053.html (15,257 bytes)

3. Re: [RTTY] RU macros - my views (score: 1)
Author: David Levine <david@levinecentral.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2015 12:43:32 -0500
"The lost CQ", if it means the run station not adding "CQ" at the end of their CQ macro, it's my #1 item. Eg: CQ RU XX1XX XX1XX vs CQ RU XX1XX XX1XX CQ As an enthusiastic S&P'er I run into this over
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-01/msg00054.html (14,644 bytes)

4. Re: [RTTY] RU macros - my views (score: 1)
Author: Claude Du Berger <duberger.miousse81@globetrotter.net>
Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2015 13:01:45 -0500
CQ at the end when in RUN is the best. Some use QRZ but QRZ is not a general call, it is WHO IS CALLING ME? You should have heard someone calling to use that... so the S&P guy may still wait and lost
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-01/msg00056.html (8,495 bytes)

5. Re: [RTTY] RU macros - my views (score: 1)
Author: Jeff Stai <wk6i.jeff@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2015 10:23:22 -0800
Well, OK, but as a religious applier of the CQ at the end, I'd really appreciate it if people would pay attention to it: ... P5ABC 599 NV NV W7RN 599 123 123 P5ABC P5ABC TU W7RN CQ P5ABC P5ABC DE KB0
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-01/msg00059.html (9,076 bytes)

6. Re: [RTTY] RU macros - my views (score: 1)
Author: Al Kozakiewicz <akozak@hourglass.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2015 18:35:32 +0000
You forgot "5NN". And, from experienced operators who should know better, no repeat of the key part of the exchange, especially on 80 and 40 meters where the error rate from noise is very high on sig
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-01/msg00060.html (10,514 bytes)

7. Re: [RTTY] RU macros - my views (score: 1)
Author: iw1ayd - Salvatore Irato <iw1ayd@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2015 19:50:35 +0100
On 05/01/2015 19:01, Claude Du Berger wrote: CQ at the end when in RUN is the best. Some use QRZ but QRZ is not a general call, it is WHO IS CALLING ME? You should have heard someone calling to use t
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-01/msg00062.html (11,031 bytes)

8. Re: [RTTY] RU macros - my views (score: 1)
Author: iw1ayd - Salvatore Irato <iw1ayd@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2015 20:16:37 +0100
HI Jeff, you wrote down somewhat I couldn't have written in my already log mail, well done. What I could say Jef. Us TAIL END CQ are here to suffer the same inflictions from very one other in the wor
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-01/msg00066.html (11,970 bytes)

9. Re: [RTTY] RU macros - my views (score: 1)
Author: David Levine <david@levinecentral.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2015 14:31:27 -0500
This particular exchange can happen by mistake (operator error) when using N1MM. I haven't used other contest programs to determine if it's possible that this error could occur in other programs. TES
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-01/msg00067.html (13,544 bytes)

10. Re: [RTTY] RU macros - my views (score: 1)
Author: Jeff Stai <wk6i.jeff@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2015 12:20:31 -0800
In many cases I suspect the operator is having a bit of fun with us when they do that. Like the California op sending "CACA", and I think some ops contrive to send numbers without FIGS to trip the ne
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-01/msg00071.html (9,080 bytes)

11. Re: [RTTY] RU macros - my views (score: 1)
Author: iw1ayd - Salvatore Irato <iw1ayd@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2015 21:52:41 +0100
Right David, it could be an operator error under N1MM Classic and N1MM+ with ESM enabled ... but I am stuck one step before when S&P. In my DI windows macros there is the one in the leftmost and high
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-01/msg00076.html (17,245 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 11
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu