Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Re\:\s+\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Morons\s+at\s+the\s+NCJ\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Re\:\s+\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Morons\s+at\s+the\s+NCJ\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] Re: [CQ-Contest] Morons at the NCJ (score: 1): Author: Tyler Stewart" <k3mm@home.com (Tyler Stewart); Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2002 16:25:06 -0000; As an "all-mode" contester, I would have to say that the RTTY WPX is the second or third largest RTTY contest of the year. The XE RTTY contest is a very minor and shouldnt even be considered as an ob; /archives//html/RTTY/2002-02/msg00118.html (10,842 bytes)
2. [RTTY] Re: [CQ-Contest] Morons at the NCJ (score: 1): Author: w2up@mindspring.com (Barry ); Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2002 17:53:59 -0000; As a "two mode" contester (CW and RTTY), I agree with Tyler one hundred percent. As I've said before on the RTTY Reflector, IMO, there are way too many minor RTTY contests, and I would much rather se; /archives//html/RTTY/2002-02/msg00119.html (12,707 bytes)
3. [RTTY] Re: [CQ-Contest] Morons at the NCJ (score: 1): Author: k4ik@subich.com (Joe Subich, K4IK); Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2002 17:06:59 -0500; The same "too many minor contests" argument could be made for all modes ... with all the QSO parties, Sprints, various national society DX contests, and specialty band contests, I doubt there is a s; /archives//html/RTTY/2002-02/msg00120.html (9,265 bytes)
4. [RTTY] Re: [CQ-Contest] Morons at the NCJ (score: 1): Author: aa5au@bellsouth.net (Don Hill AA5AU); Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 09:31:59 -0600; I agree with both Tyler & Barry on this one. It would be better to move the NA Sprint up to the XE RTTY weekend. There is not a whole of activity in XE RTTY even though I did make nearly 800 Q's this; /archives//html/RTTY/2002-02/msg00168.html (15,060 bytes)
5. [RTTY] Re: [CQ-Contest] Morons at the NCJ (score: 1): Author: k4bai@att.net (k4bai@att.net); Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 16:09:59 +0000; This discussion needs to keep in mind that moving the CW Sprint one weekend earlier will mean changing the SSB Sprint weekend also. I guess that would mean swapping them. That would mean losing most; /archives//html/RTTY/2002-02/msg00178.html (16,978 bytes)
6. [RTTY] Re: [CQ-Contest] Morons at the NCJ (score: 1): Author: wa9als@starband.net (WA9ALS - John); Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 12:17:45 -0500; Is there any chance that changing the title of this thread would help those that make the decisions even pay any attention to the valid concerns? ;-); /archives//html/RTTY/2002-02/msg00182.html (8,158 bytes)
7. [RTTY] Re: [CQ-Contest] Morons at the NCJ (score: 1): Author: k4ik@subich.com (Joe Subich, K4IK); Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 14:36:17 -0500; Swapping the sprint weekends is one approach. However, to put the shoe on the other foot, how about exchanging the XE and WPX weekends? This is something the RTTY people can do on their own without; /archives//html/RTTY/2002-02/msg00191.html (8,462 bytes)
8. [RTTY] Re: [CQ-Contest] Morons at the NCJ (score: 1): Author: vk4cej@hamsnet.net (John - vk4cej); Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 20:31:16 +1000; while on the subject of XE rtty contest.... I was led to believe that I won the Oceania section of this contest in the year 2001 (and if not Oceania, at least 1st place Australia) but have yet to rec; /archives//html/RTTY/2002-02/msg00240.html (8,769 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]