Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Re\:\s+\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+RTTY\s+WPX\s+and\s+NA\s+Sprint\s+CW\s+this\s+weekend\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] Re: [CQ-Contest] RTTY WPX and NA Sprint CW this weekend (score: 1)
Author: W4EF@dellroy.com (Mike)
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2002 10:47:38 -0800
This is right in the middle of the "meat" where the bulk of CW sprint QSOs typically take place. I am not familiar with the RTTY bandplan. How come it is so low in the band. I thought RTTY was typica
/archives//html/RTTY/2002-02/msg00100.html (9,050 bytes)

2. [RTTY] Re: [CQ-Contest] RTTY WPX and NA Sprint CW this weekend (score: 1)
Author: kr6x@kr6x.com (Leigh S. Jones, KR6X)
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2002 10:55:26 -0800
This kind of request is a little like asking the CQWW SSB contest to stay off of 20 Meters. the the The We
/archives//html/RTTY/2002-02/msg00102.html (8,648 bytes)

3. [RTTY] Re: [CQ-Contest] RTTY WPX and NA Sprint CW this weekend (score: 1)
Author: aa4lr@arrl.net (Bill Coleman)
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2002 15:07:11 -0500
Easy. Region 1 (and much of Region 3) only has 7000-7100 kHz. SSB operations typically go down to 7040 kHz. Then RTTY, then CW. You'll also note that the QRP CW calling frequency is 7040. 7040 is the
/archives//html/RTTY/2002-02/msg00106.html (7,640 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu