Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Re\:\s+Rtty\s+and\s+Ritty\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] Re: Rtty and Ritty (score: 1)
Author: Richard Kriss <aa5vu@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 09:52:21 -0500
Charlie, KI5XP At first I thought it was me only but I have found my PK-232 with the really old MacRATT software copies RTTY much better than any sound card application I have tried. I have even trie
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-04/msg00190.html (7,325 bytes)

2. Re: [RTTY] Re: Rtty and Ritty (score: 1)
Author: "John Fleming" <john@wa9als.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 10:19:20 -0500
Charlie, you must have one heck of a PK-232! I think you're about the first person to make such claims. MMTTY can copy signals that aren't audible, so it's no slouch. And RITTY's better!) We all have
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-04/msg00191.html (9,663 bytes)

3. Re: [RTTY] Re: Rtty and Ritty (score: 1)
Author: "Barry " <w2up@mindspring.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 11:30:01 -0400
In my experience, MMTTY does a great job with 99% of signals. On some of the over the pole fluttery signals (JA, UA0, etc. from east coast) the KAM, which I no longer own, did a marginally better job
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-04/msg00192.html (9,074 bytes)

4. Re: [RTTY] Re: Rtty and Ritty (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <wrt@dslextreme.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 09:33:20 -0700
I have been on the RTTY reflector for over ten years and this is the first time anyone has commented that the PK-232 was better than MMTTY or other soundcard software. Richard, I think you'd better r
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-04/msg00193.html (7,965 bytes)

5. Re: [RTTY] Re: Rtty and Ritty (score: 1)
Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 10:58:41 -0700
On Apr 20, 2004, at 9:33 AM, Bill Turner wrote: It does not surprise me that your KAM out performed the sound card. It not only surprises me, I'm sure there is some configuration problem there. MMTTY
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-04/msg00194.html (11,351 bytes)

6. Re: [RTTY] Re: Rtty and Ritty (score: 1)
Author: K4SB <k4sb@bellsouth.net>
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 18:09:01 +0000
I'd like to throw this out just for opinion. Someone recently mentioned that his Turtle Beach sound card scored a 7b on the WL test. I just installed mine and it came back as a 7f, the highest. Now,
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-04/msg00195.html (8,708 bytes)

7. Re: [RTTY] Re: Rtty and Ritty (score: 1)
Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 11:56:13 -0700 (PDT)
When I had an Win98 machine, I was always impressed at how well RITTY by K6STI copied over-the-pole signals. Now I am running a WinXP machine, but I have never been as impressed with MMTTY. I have a
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-04/msg00197.html (7,842 bytes)

8. Re: [RTTY] Re: Rtty and Ritty (score: 1)
Author: llindblom@juno.com
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 20:06:14 GMT
Ah, but if it was SSB then you would have the worlds best filtering and decoding devices at your finger tips to dig the ESP signal out of the S9 +20 static on a crowded band and that device is the hu
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-04/msg00199.html (7,981 bytes)

9. Re: [RTTY] Re: Rtty and Ritty (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 17:52:19 -0400
"Kok Chen" <chen@mac.com> wrote: "the KAMs are pretty simple" Possibly the main reason I use a KAMPlus! :)) C'Ya, Shelby _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contest
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-04/msg00203.html (7,920 bytes)

10. Re: [RTTY] Re: Rtty and Ritty (score: 1)
Author: alan@wa9als.com
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 10:22:48 -0500 (EST)
I need to send my PK-232 in for repairs. There must be something wrong with it. Alan, WD9GMK _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contest
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-04/msg00209.html (10,516 bytes)

11. Re: [RTTY] Re: Rtty and Ritty (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@charter.net>
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 18:29:19 -0700
Yeah, and they are playing with "MRam" now too. No hard drive. Just super sized ram that hold everything. Tom W7WHY -- Original Message -- From: "K4SB" the motherboard had 10 USB ports, no mouse or k
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-04/msg00213.html (8,870 bytes)

12. Re: [RTTY] Re: Rtty and Ritty (score: 1)
Author: "Jim McDonald" <jim@n7us.net>
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 20:57:00 -0700
Ed, My Turtle Beach scored a 7b too on my fast machine. It's a Dell 8300 P4 3 GHz, hyperthreading, with 1G of RAM. (I bought it from the Dell Outlet site to last a long time.) The message was: Writel
/archives//html/RTTY/2004-04/msg00224.html (10,758 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu