- 1. [RTTY] Re: WTB: PK232 (score: 1)
- Author: Richard Kriss <aa5vu@arrl.net>
- Date: Sun, 30 May 2004 12:02:11 -0500
- Bob, Just to hear the flip side. If I really want to work something for a new country, I use the PK-232 rather than MMTTY and sound card stuff. The PK-232 may be old but it really works. Some of the
- /archives//html/RTTY/2004-05/msg00184.html (7,605 bytes)
- 2. [RTTY] Re: WTB: PK232 (score: 1)
- Author: Richard Kriss <aa5vu@sbcglobal.net>
- Date: Sun, 30 May 2004 12:01:53 -0500
- Bob, Just to hear the flip side. If I really want to work something for a new country, I use the PK-232 rather than MMTTY and sound card stuff. The PK-232 may be old but it really works. Some of the
- /archives//html/RTTY/2004-05/msg00185.html (7,246 bytes)
- 3. Re: [RTTY] Re: WTB: PK232 (score: 1)
- Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>
- Date: Sun, 30 May 2004 11:28:26 -0700
- On May 30, 2004, at 10:01 AM, Richard Kriss wrote: Some of the sound card software packages have neat bells and whistles but for solid RTTY copy I find the PK-232 hard to beat. From: Bill Turner <wrt
- /archives//html/RTTY/2004-05/msg00186.html (7,850 bytes)
- 4. Re: [RTTY] Re: WTB: PK232 (score: 1)
- Author: Reid Hill <kc5ykx@swbell.net>
- Date: Sun, 30 May 2004 11:56:21 -0700 (PDT)
- And while your at Chen see if you can convince him that PCs are better than Macs for ham radio. :-) Neither one will probablly happen. Reid KC5YKX _______________________________________________ RTTY
- /archives//html/RTTY/2004-05/msg00187.html (7,701 bytes)
- 5. Re: [RTTY] Re: WTB: PK232 (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Turner <wrt@dslextreme.com>
- Date: Sun, 30 May 2004 12:07:37 -0700
- _________________________________________________________ The overwhelming majority of MMTTY/PK-232 users would disagree with you. I suspect there is something wrong with your MMTTY setup, either sou
- /archives//html/RTTY/2004-05/msg00188.html (8,125 bytes)
- 6. Re: [RTTY] Re: WTB: PK232 (score: 1)
- Author: KLØS <kl0s@cox.net>
- Date: Sun, 30 May 2004 15:17:17 -0400
- Bill makes a good point that the software programs do a pretty good job....I use a Hal ST-8000 as the "front end" for a PK-232 (a ST-6 feeds the other) and can watch the copy of that setup over on th
- /archives//html/RTTY/2004-05/msg00189.html (7,709 bytes)
- 7. Re: [RTTY] Re: WTB: PK232 (score: 1)
- Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>
- Date: Sun, 30 May 2004 12:43:12 -0700
- On May 30, 2004, at 11:56 AM, Reid Hill wrote: And while your at Chen see if you can convince him that PCs are better than Macs for ham radio. :-) To do that would be insincere on my part since all t
- /archives//html/RTTY/2004-05/msg00190.html (7,488 bytes)
- 8. Re: [RTTY] Re: WTB: PK232 (score: 1)
- Author: Jerry Flanders <jeflanders@comcast.net>
- Date: Mon, 31 May 2004 02:35:12 +0000
- At 19:17 5/30/04, KL0S/4 wrote: Bill makes a good point that the software programs do a pretty good job....I use a Hal ST-8000 as the "front end" for a PK-232 (a ST-6 feeds the other) and can watch t
- /archives//html/RTTY/2004-05/msg00193.html (8,475 bytes)
- 9. Re: [RTTY] Re: WTB: PK232 (score: 1)
- Author: "Ken K7ZUM" <Ken.Knopp@verizon.net>
- Date: Sun, 30 May 2004 21:27:27 -0700
- Hmmm, lets see if I can do one better, come the next CQ WW RTTY test, I'll get W7EJ, who is just a little bit west of Chen, and ME, I'am just a little bit east of Chen, together we can point our beam
- /archives//html/RTTY/2004-05/msg00194.html (8,408 bytes)
- 10. Re: [RTTY] Re: WTB: PK232 (score: 1)
- Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>
- Date: Sun, 30 May 2004 23:31:58 -0700
- On May 30, 2004, at 9:27 PM, Ken K7ZUM wrote: together we can point our beams and a kilowatt of so of RTTY at Chen's Mac's and see if we can "toast" them for him !! Heheheheheheh !!! I *knew* there i
- /archives//html/RTTY/2004-05/msg00195.html (8,561 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu