Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Re\s+ZC4LI\s+AMPS\s+\!\!\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Re\s+ZC4LI\s+AMPS\s+\!\!\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] Re ZC4LI AMPS !! (score: 1): Author: "Steve and Judy" <hodgson@cytanet.com.cy>; Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 09:24:50 +0200; Jim, thank you for your input. The main point of my email was to refute the inferrence made by previous posts {see below] that because I was using amplifiers I could not possibly be classed as a low; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-02/msg00133.html (9,605 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] Re ZC4LI AMPS !! (score: 1): Author: Boyan <lz2be@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 08:20:21 -0800 (PST); Hi, contest rules for SOLP state power limitation at 100W. There is nothing mentioned about RIG setup. If Steve is using his setup at 100W where is the problem? 73! Boyan LZ2BE/LZ8E Jim, thank you fo; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-02/msg00138.html (10,218 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] Re ZC4LI AMPS !! (score: 1): Author: "B. Smith" <billn3xl@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 09:19:26 -0800 (PST); This scenario is just an example of why perhaps both power and antenna capabilities should be the factors in determining the entry category. The entry categories that we have now in no way represent; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-02/msg00139.html (12,275 bytes)
4. Re: [RTTY] Re ZC4LI AMPS !! (score: 1): Author: "Glenn Wyant" <va3dx@sympatico.ca>; Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 14:31:20 -0500; So who is this Chris ... making an accusation like this, and then wont even sign his call, IF ANY ??? Gutless.... Glenn VA3DX _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@co; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-02/msg00142.html (7,786 bytes)
5. Re: [RTTY] Re ZC4LI AMPS !! (score: 1): Author: "Stuart Spatz" <slspatz@cox.net>; Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 16:30:11 -0500; I see nothing wrong with using the amp as long as it is running at 100 watts or less. I have often thought about doing that, since all I have now is an Icom 757 and hate to run RTTY at 100 watts. I c; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-02/msg00150.html (7,412 bytes)
6. Re: [RTTY] Re ZC4LI AMPS !! (score: 1): Author: Fabi va2up <va2up@live.ca>; Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 17:31:19 -0500; I agree 100%. No further comment necessary. 73, Fabi va2up _________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@con; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-02/msg00152.html (12,636 bytes)
7. Re: [RTTY] Re ZC4LI AMPS !! (score: 1): Author: "Don Hill AA5AU" <aa5au@bellsouth.net>; Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 16:31:51 -0600; There's nothing wrong with running an amp while operating in the low power category if the rules permit it. As long as you don't exceed the legal output for that category and it's not specified in th; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-02/msg00153.html (9,711 bytes)
8. Re: [RTTY] Re ZC4LI AMPS !! (score: 1): Author: john <w8wej@citynet.net>; Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 22:54:56 +0000; I believe that the fine folk at naq need to take another look at this rule in that this really handicaps folk that run qrp or lower power rigs usually, but in some contests etc,to reach the 100 wt li; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-02/msg00156.html (10,838 bytes)
9. Re: [RTTY] Re ZC4LI AMPS !! (score: 1): Author: john <w8wej@citynet.net>; Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 22:48:20 +0000; I think enough is enough. I agree with Glenn va3dx , who actually signed a call as opposed to ????? first there are folk that run qrp rigs for qrp by and large, but at times for certain times/tests e; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-02/msg00157.html (9,749 bytes)
10. Re: [RTTY] Re ZC4LI AMPS !! (score: 1): Author: Jerry Flanders <jeflanders@comcast.net>; Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 18:52:04 -0500; Agreed. John. QRP guys often use external amps (and I wish they used them even more ;-) ). In my case, I must have my Quadra in-line for antenna switching and for its built-in ATU even if I don't act; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-02/msg00158.html (9,143 bytes)
11. Re: [RTTY] Re ZC4LI AMPS !! (score: 1): Author: "B. Smith" <billn3xl@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 07:24:58 -0800 (PST); Complaining about rules is silly, when the antenna has as much to do with radiated power as does the transmitter power output, and antennas are ignored by 99% of the contest rules. Since this is the; /archives//html/RTTY/2010-02/msg00195.html (12,291 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 11
Page: [1]