Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Reason\s+for\s+W1AW\/P\s+Delayed\s+LoTW\s+Uploads\s*$/: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] Reason for W1AW/P Delayed LoTW Uploads (score: 1)
Author: Dick Kriss <aa5vu@att.net>
Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2014 07:40:50 -0500
I wonder why some of the W1AW/P operations seem to be dragging their feet on upload of QSOs to LoTW? The current missing in action are: CO, SD, MO, WY and KP4 Dick AA5VU _____________________________
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-06/msg00067.html (7,127 bytes)

2. Re: [RTTY] Reason for W1AW/P Delayed LoTW Uploads (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Sat, 07 Jun 2014 06:51:35 -0600
Because it is a huge undertaking by the coordinators. Each individual operators log has to be sent to the ARRL then they have to upload each log separately to capture the proper country and grid. I h
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-06/msg00068.html (7,554 bytes)

3. Re: [RTTY] Reason for W1AW/P Delayed LoTW Uploads (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Sat, 07 Jun 2014 09:08:33 -0400
W1AW/KP4 is up (at least the majority of my QSOs are confirmed). MO and WY ended this week - I suspect it takes a while for the coordinator to collect logs from all the stations, perhaps even over a
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-06/msg00069.html (7,752 bytes)

4. Re: [RTTY] Reason for W1AW/P Delayed LoTW Uploads (score: 1)
Author: Edwin Karl <edk0kl@centurytel.net>
Date: Sat, 07 Jun 2014 19:41:41 -0500
Gee Dick Missouri (MO) finished at 7pm CDT Tuesday, Log uploaded today (Saturday). Its a shame you had to wait 3 whole days ... How long do you take until you upload DXCC? ed K0KL The current missing
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-06/msg00077.html (8,102 bytes)

5. Re: [RTTY] Reason for W1AW/P Delayed LoTW Uploads (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Sun, 08 Jun 2014 09:51:58 -0600
Colorado was sent to the ARRL on June 2nd. Mike W0MU The current missing in action are: CO, SD, MO, WY and KP4 Dick AA5VU _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contes
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-06/msg00078.html (7,929 bytes)

6. Re: [RTTY] Reason for W1AW/P Delayed LoTW Uploads (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Sun, 08 Jun 2014 12:02:53 -0400
Interesting that someone at ARRL HQ can't be bothered to turn them around (upload to LotW) for an entire business week. 73, ... Joe, W4TV Mike W0MU The current missing in action are: CO, SD, MO, WY a
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-06/msg00079.html (9,276 bytes)

7. Re: [RTTY] Reason for W1AW/P Delayed LoTW Uploads (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Sun, 08 Jun 2014 10:12:23 -0600
Too busy working on new talking points for RM-11708? Mike W0MU Interesting that someone at ARRL HQ can't be bothered to turn them around (upload to LotW) for an entire business week. 73, ... Joe, W4T
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-06/msg00080.html (9,783 bytes)

8. Re: [RTTY] Reason for W1AW/P Delayed LoTW Uploads (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Sun, 08 Jun 2014 12:22:20 -0400
Or figuring out how they can sell out to US Power Squadron (boaters). 73, ... Joe, W4TV Mike W0MU Interesting that someone at ARRL HQ can't be bothered to turn them around (upload to LotW) for an ent
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-06/msg00081.html (10,147 bytes)

9. Re: [RTTY] Reason for W1AW/P Delayed LoTW Uploads (score: 1)
Author: Richard Kriss <aa5vu@att.net>
Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2014 12:08:14 -0500
Ed K0KL, I was not picking on either MO or WY as those operations just finished. Some of the past operations have taken a long time to upload or to be processed at ARRL. The 8-Jun-2014 ARRL web page
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-06/msg00082.html (9,523 bytes)

10. Re: [RTTY] Reason for W1AW/P Delayed LoTW Uploads (score: 1)
Author: Al Kozakiewicz <akozak@hourglass.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2014 13:20:34 -0400
Just FYI, the uploads to LoTW are being processed by N1MM, among others - hardly someone whose dedication or competence needs questioning. If these states are anything like mine (NY), many of the pro
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-06/msg00083.html (9,547 bytes)

11. Re: [RTTY] Reason for W1AW/P Delayed LoTW Uploads (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Sun, 08 Jun 2014 11:23:19 -0600
What do you mean do not include duplicates? You mean duplicate logs from the same guy or duplicate contacts? Mike W0MU On 6/8/2014 11:20 AM, Al Kozakiewicz wrote: Just FYI, the uploads to LoTW are be
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-06/msg00084.html (9,771 bytes)

12. Re: [RTTY] Reason for W1AW/P Delayed LoTW Uploads (score: 1)
Author: Edwin Karl <edk0kl@centurytel.net>
Date: Sun, 08 Jun 2014 13:51:59 -0500
Maybe it's best to be more selective, your comments painted with a big brush ... I can't explain any other state, though a frequent phrase in Washington these days is " ..what difference does it make
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-06/msg00085.html (10,113 bytes)

13. Re: [RTTY] Reason for W1AW/P Delayed LOTW Uploads (score: 1)
Author: Dick Kriss <aa5vu@att.net>
Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2014 15:39:38 -0500
Tim N3QF, Thanks for the note. I was not aware of the time consuming serial process individual station, to state organizer, to ARRL HQ, to some LoTW record keeping. I now have a better appreciation f
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-06/msg00086.html (7,313 bytes)

14. Re: [RTTY] Reason for W1AW/P Delayed LoTW Uploads (score: 1)
Author: Al Kozakiewicz <akozak@hourglass.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2014 17:56:40 -0400
Is there a difference? Duplicate QSOs could result from submitting a log more than once, or by submitting multiple logs with overlapping duplicated entries. Same result. Both happened in NY. Al AB2ZY
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-06/msg00087.html (11,038 bytes)

15. Re: [RTTY] Reason for W1AW/P Delayed LoTW Uploads (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Sun, 08 Jun 2014 18:13:06 -0600
I hope you are talking about exact duplicates which makes sense and not someone that worked W1AW/X multiple times on the same band mode. I thought LOTW removed or disregarded duplicate contacts......
/archives//html/RTTY/2014-06/msg00089.html (11,376 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu