Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Repeats\:\s+State\s+vs\s+Province\s+vs\s+QTH\s+\.\.\.\s*$/: 16 ]

Total 16 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] Repeats: State vs Province vs QTH ... (score: 1)
Author: Ktfrog007@aol.com
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 17:37:02 -0500 (EST)
I just have an AGN? AGN? macro suitable for any purpose: location, serial numbers, age, name, zone, etc. One size fits all. No one has ever failed to understand it. I have a separate macro for call s
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00239.html (6,903 bytes)

2. Re: [RTTY] Repeats: State vs Province vs QTH ... (score: 1)
Author: Jerry Flanders <jeflanders@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 18:05:48 -0500
Me too, but I just use AGN AGN. I don't see the need to make it into a question and nobody has ever misunderstood AFAIK. This particular macro can also be used if I miss his call instead of QRZ?. Jer
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00243.html (7,573 bytes)

3. Re: [RTTY] Repeats: State vs Province vs QTH ... (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 17:10:33 -0600
If I need to know the other guy's state and I send "AGN AGN", I'll get his whole exchange. I don't need his whole exchange, I need his state (or name or time or whatever is appropriate for the contes
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00244.html (8,058 bytes)

4. Re: [RTTY] Repeats: State vs Province vs QTH ... (score: 1)
Author: Hank Garretson <w6sx@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 16:33:36 -0800
Come on everybody. You can be sure he isn't asking for RST repeat. Just as there is no reason to send 599 more than once in an exchange, there is no reason to send 599 when asked for a repeat of any
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00251.html (8,725 bytes)

5. Re: [RTTY] Repeats: State vs Province vs QTH ... (score: 1)
Author: WS7I <ws7ik7tj@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 07:13:45 -0800
Bingo, Hank. _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00285.html (9,631 bytes)

6. Re: [RTTY] Repeats: State vs Province vs QTH ... (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 09:32:48 -0600
So I don't get something. If time is of no issue, then why not rag-chew with each station? I see these contests as ... contests, in which the object is to work as many stations as possible. *I* may n
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00290.html (10,978 bytes)

7. Re: [RTTY] Repeats: State vs Province vs QTH ... (score: 1)
Author: k4adr@comcast.net
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 16:46:08 +0000 (UTC)
Why send 599 , there one station on Saturday who didnt send 599 , only his call and state, but on Sunday he added the 599 as per the rules.  I did not log my contact with him because it was not a ful
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00302.html (10,485 bytes)

8. Re: [RTTY] Repeats: State vs Province vs QTH ... (score: 1)
Author: William Smith <bill.n3xl@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 09:29:17 -0800 (PST)
k4adr, I think that a missing 599 is an example of what happens when people get carried away with trying to use every trick in the book to achieve brevity, then end up with bad operating practices. A
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00309.html (12,915 bytes)

9. Re: [RTTY] Repeats: State vs Province vs QTH ... (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 15:54:42 -0500
"Case in point, an RST is a required field in some contest exchanges and a message without it is incomplete." No disagreement, from me, and it is part of the exchange in Roundup. Since most logging p
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00346.html (10,545 bytes)

10. Re: [RTTY] Repeats: State vs Province vs QTH ... (score: 1)
Author: William Smith <bill.n3xl@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 13:34:24 -0800 (PST)
Shelby, Not knocking 3830, but I don't do soapboxes or use it. By The time I export my files send them to the contest sponsor, PVRC database, eQSL, and LoTW, I am ready to move on to something else b
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00349.html (12,038 bytes)

11. Re: [RTTY] Repeats: State vs Province vs QTH ... (score: 1)
Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 13:42:41 -0800
Hah! The ARRL robot dinged me for manually typing N0MM into the log as NOMM. I hope the robot gives N0MM credit for the QSO, since I have no plan to correct the entry. 73 Chen, W7AY _________________
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00350.html (8,967 bytes)

12. Re: [RTTY] Repeats: State vs Province vs QTH ... (score: 1)
Author: Mike <k4gmh@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 16:46:32 -0500
Hello Shelby, You are right, I believe we missed each other in this Contest. Regarding the "599", I received "559" a couple of times. Logged the received RST as 559. Wondering if the log he(they) sen
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00351.html (12,330 bytes)

13. Re: [RTTY] Repeats: State vs Province vs QTH ... (score: 1)
Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 14:27:52 -0800
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: REPLY: With all due respect Shelby, I think you are missing the point of having a reflector vs just sending personal emails. Invariably, topics will come up that individuals may not
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00354.html (9,689 bytes)

14. Re: [RTTY] Repeats: State vs Province vs QTH ... (score: 1)
Author: "Larry" <lknain@nc.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 18:19:56 -0500
I didn't see any in RU this time but I usually see a few in other contests where the RST is not 599. I have seen comments from contest committee members at different times saying that that part of th
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00357.html (14,538 bytes)

15. Re: [RTTY] Repeats: State vs Province vs QTH ... (score: 1)
Author: Claude Du Berger <duberger.miousse81@globetrotter.net>
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 18:39:00 -0500
N1MM is not so stupid, it will send what you want it to send... 73, Claude VE2FK Just because N1MM, for example, only sends 599 doesn't mean other loggers can't send something other than 599. 73, Lar
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00358.html (9,170 bytes)

16. Re: [RTTY] Repeats: State vs Province vs QTH ... (score: 1)
Author: "w4gkm@juno.com" <w4gkm@juno.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 17:05:42 GMT
Shelby, my thoughts exactly. Nick W4GKM -- Original Message -- From: Mike <k4gmh@arrl.net> To: Shelby Summerville <k4ww@arrl.net> Cc: rtty@contesting.com Subject: Re: [RTTY] Repeats: State vs Provinc
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00475.html (13,080 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu