- 1. [RTTY] Robot Processing RST (score: 1)
- Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
- Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 08:52:13 -0800
- The log submission robots' purpose is to check format and give feedback when there is an error. It checks that the RST field is a three digit number that meets the requirements of an RST. So, '1234'
- /archives//html/RTTY/2016-02/msg00258.html (10,124 bytes)
- 2. Re: [RTTY] Robot Processing RST (score: 1)
- Author: "Jeff AC0C" <keepwalking188@ac0c.com>
- Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 11:09:00 -0600
- Thanks Ed for the clarification. 73/jeff/ac0c www.ac0c.com alpha-charlie-zero-charlie The log submission robots' purpose is to check format and give feedback when there is an error. It checks that th
- /archives//html/RTTY/2016-02/msg00259.html (10,900 bytes)
- 3. Re: [RTTY] Robot Processing RST (score: 1)
- Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 11:10:38 -0600
- If I configure my program to transmit 589 instead of 599 and the other op's program logs that I sent 599, will the robot kick that out as a mismatch? I think inclusion of RST is silly and would rathe
- /archives//html/RTTY/2016-02/msg00260.html (9,975 bytes)
- 4. Re: [RTTY] Robot Processing RST (score: 1)
- Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
- Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 10:07:52 -0800
- No. The robot's only function is to check the Cabrillo file for format errors. 589 is a valid RST, so the robot will be happy. Ed W0YK _______________________________________________________________
- /archives//html/RTTY/2016-02/msg00264.html (9,785 bytes)
- 5. Re: [RTTY] Robot Processing RST (score: 1)
- Author: "Jim W7RY" <w7ry@centurytel.net>
- Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 21:11:41 -0800
- I received a 579 from a weekend gleeker on Sunday. I put it in the log as what he sent. It had better count! 73 Jim W7RY --Original Message-- From: Peter Laws Sent: Friday, February 19, 2016 9:10 AM
- /archives//html/RTTY/2016-02/msg00268.html (10,907 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu