Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+SO1R\s+\/\s+SO2R\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+SO1R\s+\/\s+SO2R\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] SO1R / SO2R (score: 1): Author: d.hulatt@btinternet.com (Dave Hulatt); Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 21:16:11 -0000; How about a new power category for contests? High power / Low power means very little to me. 100W into vertical/dipole =3D (3dbi * 100) =3D EIRP 300W 100W into directional antenna =3D (8dbi * 100) =3; /archives//html/RTTY/2002-03/msg00407.html (7,662 bytes)
2. [RTTY] SO1R / SO2R (score: 1): Author: chen@mac.com (Kok Chen); Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 14:21:12 -0800; Ooohhhh! I LIKE this! But, why not just drop the directivity A&B category altogether. Just use transmit EIRP (since directivity is already baked into that figure) as the "category". Allow the station; /archives//html/RTTY/2002-03/msg00408.html (8,219 bytes)
3. [RTTY] SO1R / SO2R (score: 1): Author: martyt@pobox.com (Marty Tippin); Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 14:34:48 -0800 (PST); Whose gain figures do you use? The manufacturer's or something that more closely represents reality? == -Marty NW0L martyt@pobox.com __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!?; /archives//html/RTTY/2002-03/msg00410.html (7,250 bytes)
4. [RTTY] SO1R / SO2R (score: 1): Author: chen@mac.com (Kok Chen); Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 15:24:04 -0800; Anyone using the manufacturers' claims are just disadvantaging themselves, HI HI. Especially the ones using 11m antennas on 10m :-P. It has been shown quite often (see past issues of Communications Q; /archives//html/RTTY/2002-03/msg00413.html (8,210 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]