Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+SO2R\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+SO2R\s*$/: 68 ]

Total 68 documents matching your query.

61. [RTTY] SO2R (score: 1): Author: "Ross Biggar" <rbiggar@ihug.co.nz>; Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 15:46:40 +1300; It is even more difficult from here in New Zealand, the more callsigns the better, as the signals are weaker and the QRM didn,t help. I sent my callsign 3 times when answering a CQ just to make sure; /archives//html/RTTY/2015-09/msg00122.html (7,657 bytes)
62. Re: [RTTY] SO2R (score: 1): Author: Ron Kolarik <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>; Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2015 22:21:34 -0500; I only had one station run the RST and zone together and you're right it doesn't seem to work in N1MM+ but it's the first time I used N1MM+ so it could be me. Ron K0IDT 73 Mike K5TRI ________________; /archives//html/RTTY/2015-09/msg00123.html (9,278 bytes)
63. Re: [RTTY] SO2R (score: 1): Author: Martin Berube <ve2nmb@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 10:06:53 -0400; I like the idea of modular messages. What I often do when I am in s&p is to send my callsign after my exchange if i beleive the other station have my callsign wrong. Otherwise, I dont't send it. Many; /archives//html/RTTY/2015-09/msg00131.html (15,768 bytes)
64. Re: [RTTY] SO2R (score: 1): Author: Jeff Stai <wk6i.jeff@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 09:36:28 -0700; Yes exactly, and appreciated. Sending twice if you can is even more attention getting. And if it turns out I had it right I'll still send it back with the TU as an acknowledgment. 73 jeff wk6i -- Jef; /archives//html/RTTY/2015-09/msg00133.html (9,496 bytes)
65. Re: [RTTY] SO2R (score: 1): Author: "John GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.org.uk>; Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 19:18:40 +0100; So the SO2R op deliberately slows every contact down by 1.5 seconds? Very odd, considering all the past debate about extra time taken to send a single space after a call :-) and that's 1.5 seconds of; /archives//html/RTTY/2015-09/msg00168.html (13,625 bytes)
66. [RTTY] SO2R (score: 1): Author: Tom Osborne <w7why@frontier.com>; Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2016 09:22:19 -0800; SO2R on RTTY is being done by a lot now, but is it fair to have someone standing by, waiting after your CQ while you are working someone else on the other radio. I's seeing some now that will call CQ; /archives//html/RTTY/2016-02/msg00089.html (6,556 bytes)
67. Re: [RTTY] SO2R (score: 1): Author: Ron W7FIA <fia@clouddancer.com>; Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2016 10:38:12 -0800 (PST); Watching the serial number is indicative. Contests are for learning too, or don't wait, in a big contest there is someone just up the band...or if it's empty there, run a bit. GRITTY is a local spot; /archives//html/RTTY/2016-02/msg00090.html (7,225 bytes)
68. Re: [RTTY] SO2R (score: 1): Author: "Jeff AC0C" <keepwalking188@ac0c.com>; Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2016 15:44:16 -0600; If you don't want to wait, move on. There are plenty of other guys to work. And don't assume it's always some So2r thing. If you have fumbled a callsign correction or stuck the number in the RST fiel; /archives//html/RTTY/2016-02/msg00091.html (7,738 bytes)

Current List: 61 - 68
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4]