Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Scott\s+\&\s+David\s+Rude\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] Scott & David Rude (score: 1)
Author: "Thomas F. Giella W4HM" <thomasfgiella@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2015 12:36:21 -0500
Wow Scott you very rude here on this email reflector and I'm sure also on the bands while operating in RTTY contests. So to avoid your rudeness I'll unsubscribe from this email reflector and will mak
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-01/msg00104.html (6,877 bytes)

2. Re: [RTTY] Scott & David Rude (score: 1)
Author: David Cole <dave@nk7z.net>
Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2015 10:38:24 -0800
Hi, Don't leave, defend your point! No one is mad at you, they just disagree with something you said. I honestly disagree with you here, I see no way you could tell that your score was not impacted,
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-01/msg00106.html (8,913 bytes)

3. Re: [RTTY] Scott & David Rude (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2015 13:57:40 -0600
Well, some people have thinner skin than others. Whatever. Now, about not working people, that is something I'd like to be able do (unless they are operating from P5). Is there a way, in MMTTY and/or
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-01/msg00108.html (7,983 bytes)

4. Re: [RTTY] Scott & David Rude (score: 1)
Author: David Cole <dave@nk7z.net>
Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2015 12:54:29 -0800
That is a very good idea! There could be a little LID button on the software, and if more than X people voted a station LID, it would make them be red for a day! You sir are very clever!! -- Thanks a
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-01/msg00109.html (8,858 bytes)

5. Re: [RTTY] Scott & David Rude (score: 1)
Author: Neal Campbell <nealk3nc@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2015 16:27:27 -0500
Every one of these discussions always is based on the assumption that the author isn't a LID and everyone else is a LID candidate. Of course, this means whoever is the person putting the LID list in
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-01/msg00110.html (10,707 bytes)

6. Re: [RTTY] Scott & David Rude (score: 1)
Author: Hank Garretson <w6sx@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2015 13:34:49 -0800
Hey everyone, go work some new ones! Diddle Exuberantly, Hank, W6SX _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-01/msg00111.html (7,539 bytes)

7. Re: [RTTY] Scott & David Rude (score: 1)
Author: David Cole <dave@nk7z.net>
Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2015 14:37:54 -0800
Re read my post... :) -- Thanks and 73's, For equipment, and software setups and reviews see: www.nk7z.net for MixW support see; http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/mixw/info for Dopplergram informati
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-01/msg00112.html (12,132 bytes)

8. Re: [RTTY] Scott & David Rude (score: 1)
Author: "Scott Schultz" <schultz0530@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2015 18:10:27 -0600
Wow Scott you very rude here on this email reflector and I'm sure also on the bands while operating in RTTY contests. I checked my logs going back as far as I have been keeping electronic logs (which
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-01/msg00113.html (8,192 bytes)

9. Re: [RTTY] Scott & David Rude (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2015 09:04:11 -0600
Nah. They're too narrow. Besides, each band will soon be a PACTOR 4 channel - Channels 12, 17, and 30. -- Peter Laws | N5UWY | plaws plaws net | Travel by Train! _____________________________________
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-01/msg00127.html (8,254 bytes)

10. Re: [RTTY] Scott & David Rude (score: 1)
Author: Dave Greig <daven3buo@att.net>
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2015 09:11:17 -0600
I have a great Idea.... Why don't we propose giving the Entire CB band to the Pactor folks... Thank You! Dave Greig N3BUO *801 Tactical* Phone: (682) 422-6667 http://www.801tactical.com Google Plus:
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-01/msg00128.html (9,111 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 10
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu