Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Should\s+NCJ\s+continue\s+the\s+RTTY\s+Sprints\?\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] Should NCJ continue the RTTY Sprints? (score: 1)
Author: wa9als@starband.net (WA9ALS - John)
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2003 07:11:11 -0500
NCJ sponsors four RTTY contests per year - two NAQP RTTY contests (February and now July) and two RTTY Sprint contests (March and October). Participation in the NAQP RTTY contests is healthy. For ex
/archives//html/RTTY/2003-01/msg00178.html (9,026 bytes)

2. [RTTY] Should NCJ continue the RTTY Sprints? (score: 1)
Author: wa9als@starband.net (WA9ALS - John)
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2003 07:56:55 -0500
Privacy notice: My email is set to forward anything I receive that includes the above subject directly to Carl, K9LA. I encourage discussion here on the reflector rather than private emails because i
/archives//html/RTTY/2003-01/msg00179.html (8,129 bytes)

3. [RTTY] Should NCJ continue the RTTY Sprints? (score: 1)
Author: dj3iw@t-online.de (DJ3IW Goetz)
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2003 13:38:02 -0000
Hello John and all, residing outside the Americas may give a differnt view towards the subject contests. The number of MAJOR RTTY contests has increased over the past years. As a result we now have A
/archives//html/RTTY/2003-01/msg00180.html (8,661 bytes)

4. [RTTY] Should NCJ continue the RTTY Sprints? (score: 1)
Author: wfking@att.net (Wayne F. King)
Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2003 12:16:06 -0500
NAQP RTTY tests are OK with me! Yes other tests are more attractive, I never did like the rules for the NCJ sprints especially working the same station on the same band after 3 Q's. Yes, I especially
/archives//html/RTTY/2003-01/msg00183.html (8,542 bytes)

5. [RTTY] Should NCJ continue the RTTY Sprints? (score: 1)
Author: sashen@swbell.net (Sid Ashen-Brenner)
Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2003 17:39:18 -0600
As one who is just on the threshold of jumping into RTTY and RTTY contesting in general, I was looking forward to a short contest to see just how well I might be able to get things to work. Hearing t
/archives//html/RTTY/2003-01/msg00185.html (10,702 bytes)

6. [RTTY] Should NCJ continue the RTTY Sprints? (score: 1)
Author: wa9als@starband.net (WA9ALS - John)
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2003 19:09:37 -0500
just It's not really bad news either, Sid, if they do get cancelled. There are several thousand RTTY contesters, and only about 30 logs were being submitted. If the Sprints get cancelled, plese don'
/archives//html/RTTY/2003-01/msg00187.html (8,837 bytes)

7. [RTTY] Should NCJ continue the RTTY Sprints? (score: 1)
Author: ke5og@brooksdata.net (Bill, KE5OG)
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2003 18:14:02 -0600
Please don't drop the Sprints. We just need to encourage more = participation. I love the sprints. I have to laugh out loud when I think about them. = It's just craziness... especially since you can
/archives//html/RTTY/2003-01/msg00188.html (8,221 bytes)

8. [RTTY] Should NCJ continue the RTTY Sprints? (score: 1)
Author: w2up@mindspring.com (Barry )
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 00:42:41 -0000
I vote for keeping the Sprints and dumping at least a dozen of the "they all look alike" 36-48 RTTY contests. This would enhance contesting by better allocating the limited resource we all have (time
/archives//html/RTTY/2003-01/msg00190.html (9,127 bytes)

9. [RTTY] Should NCJ continue the RTTY Sprints? (score: 1)
Author: aa5au@bellsouth.net (Don Hill AA5AU)
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2003 18:46:52 -0600
I agree with Bill. I'd like to see the Sprints remain. I've not been able to operate the last few because of other commitments but would otherwise participate. Don Please don't drop the Sprints. We j
/archives//html/RTTY/2003-01/msg00192.html (8,921 bytes)

10. [RTTY] Should NCJ continue the RTTY Sprints? (score: 1)
Author: llindblom@juno.com (Larry L Lindblom)
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 01:14:01 +0000
IMHO, nothing else in life (unless it was divorce #2) comes close to the excitement, frustration, and fun of an RTTY sprint! Lets keep on sprinting along. W0ETC On Thu, 9 Jan 2003 07:11:11 -0500 "WA9
/archives//html/RTTY/2003-01/msg00193.html (10,405 bytes)

11. [RTTY] Should NCJ continue the RTTY Sprints? (score: 1)
Author: k3mm@comcast.net (Tyler Stewart)
Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2003 22:27:43 -0500
I havent been very active on RTTY lately, but I'd hate to see the RTTY Sprint go...it's a very unique and exciting contest. I'm not surprised that the log count is very low...the same is true of the
/archives//html/RTTY/2003-01/msg00207.html (9,177 bytes)

12. [RTTY] Should NCJ continue the RTTY Sprints? (score: 1)
Author: etienne.rosseel@pandora.be (Etienne/ON7UI)
Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2003 13:58:43 +0100
No need to dump the other contests. It would be nice if they all have a single band option, instead of only all band /48 h . Fi entering a 10m only section you could make more use of available time
/archives//html/RTTY/2003-01/msg00213.html (8,435 bytes)

13. [RTTY] Should NCJ continue the RTTY Sprints? (score: 1)
Author: w7why@harborside.com (Tom Osborne)
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 19:32:15 -0800
of >the "other mode" sprints as well. I just wonder if a lot of the problem is the people are thinking "Why bother sending in a log--I don't have diddly squat chance of winning anything anyway." Cont
/archives//html/RTTY/2003-01/msg00224.html (8,648 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu