Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Skimmer\s+spots\s+dropped\s+at\s+VE7CC\s+cluster\s+node\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] Skimmer spots dropped at VE7CC cluster node (score: 1)
Author: Lee Sawkins <ve7cc@shaw.ca>
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 19:19:01 -0600 (MDT)
These links may be interesting to some of you. These are the typical rejected spots of any CC Cluster. RTTY skimmer spots are considered valid if spotted by ONE Skimmer. RTTY Skimmers are generally m
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-09/msg00193.html (8,225 bytes)

2. Re: [RTTY] Skimmer spots dropped at VE7CC cluster node (score: 1)
Author: "Jim W7RY" <w7ry@centurytel.net>
Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2015 16:41:44 -0700
So why am I in the busted list 41 times? 73 Jim W7RY --Original Message-- From: Lee Sawkins Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2015 6:19 PM To: rtty@contesting.com Cc: dezrat@outlook.com Subject: [RTTY]
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-10/msg00019.html (9,875 bytes)

3. Re: [RTTY] Skimmer spots dropped at VE7CC cluster node (score: 1)
Author: Lee Sawkins <ve7cc@shaw.ca>
Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2015 19:18:43 -0600 (MDT)
You get busted because you are too close in frequency and call to W7RN or W7DRM and they were there first. 73 Lee -- Original Message -- So why am I in the busted list 41 times? 73 Jim W7RY --Origina
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-10/msg00021.html (9,099 bytes)

4. Re: [RTTY] Skimmer spots dropped at VE7CC cluster node (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith N4ZR <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 06:36:25 -0400
Or conceivably because of less than perfect AFSK (bit jitteror distortion from overdrive?) 73, Pete N4ZR Download the new N1MM Logger+ at <http://N1MM.hamdocs.com>. Check out the Reverse Beacon Netwo
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-10/msg00023.html (10,473 bytes)

5. Re: [RTTY] Skimmer spots dropped at VE7CC cluster node (score: 1)
Author: "Jim W7RY" <w7ry@centurytel.net>
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 04:08:09 -0700
Probably not. Using FSK generated by DOOK (5 KHZ AFSK) and converted to FSK from 2-Tone. Icom IC7600 What it really looks like is the skimmer software has poor decode. If you look closely at the bust
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-10/msg00024.html (12,194 bytes)

6. Re: [RTTY] Skimmer spots dropped at VE7CC cluster node (score: 1)
Author: "Jim W7RY" <w7ry@centurytel.net>
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 04:16:12 -0700
Probably not. Using FSK generated by DOOK (5 KHZ AFSK) and converted to FSK from 2-Tone. Icom IC7600 What it really looks like is the skimmer software has poor decode. If you look closely at the bust
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-10/msg00025.html (11,946 bytes)

7. Re: [RTTY] Skimmer spots dropped at VE7CC cluster node (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith N4ZR <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 07:57:43 -0400
Jim, the numbers don't bear that out. Typical busted calls rates with RTTY Skimmer are in the 1.4-1.7 percent range. It would be nice to get them down into the same range as CW Skimmer (< 1 percent),
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-10/msg00026.html (14,636 bytes)

8. Re: [RTTY] Skimmer spots dropped at VE7CC cluster node (score: 1)
Author: "Jim W7RY" <w7ry@centurytel.net>
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 05:38:08 -0700
I disagree Pete. My call was never spotted by any skimmer. But it was "incorrectly" spotted 41 times. Sounds like 100% failure to me. 73 Jim W7RY Jim, the numbers don't bear that out. Typical busted
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-10/msg00028.html (15,071 bytes)

9. Re: [RTTY] Skimmer spots dropped at VE7CC cluster node (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Hachadorian" <k6ll.dave@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 06:51:03 -0700
Jim, Did I read your email correctly that you are using 2-Tone Pseudo-FSK with a 5 KHz on/off audio output? Are you using the simple transformer/diode/capacitor FSK keying circuit or the more complex
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-10/msg00029.html (9,064 bytes)

10. Re: [RTTY] Skimmer spots dropped at VE7CC cluster node (score: 1)
Author: "Alex, VE3NEA" <alshovk@dxatlas.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 10:38:28 -0400
Hi Jim, Your callsign was spotted 273 times on the first day of the contest. It also appeared 41 time on the VE7CC list of the dropped spots, but this does not necessarily mean that your call was bus
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-10/msg00030.html (15,922 bytes)

11. Re: [RTTY] Skimmer spots dropped at VE7CC cluster node (score: 1)
Author: Pete Smith N4ZR <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 14:58:01 -0400
Well, Jim, since the RBN distributed 922,012 RTTY spots from 36 Skimmers during CQWW RTTY, and since my numbers were based on detailed analysis of a half dozen of those, don't you think that the reas
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-10/msg00033.html (16,292 bytes)

12. Re: [RTTY] Skimmer spots dropped at VE7CC cluster node (score: 1)
Author: Lee Sawkins <ve7cc@shaw.ca>
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 14:40:57 -0600 (MDT)
Since most of the RTTY spots in my dropped lists were listed twice, the actual real number of dropped spots was closer to 20,000 rather than the 37,000 listed. Out of 922,000 RTTY spots over the week
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-10/msg00034.html (10,089 bytes)

13. Re: [RTTY] Skimmer spots dropped at VE7CC cluster node (score: 1)
Author: "Jim W7RY" <w7ry@centurytel.net>
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 15:26:02 -0700
My assertion was bases on the info at the bottom of this page from the VE7CC cluster/skimmer. I just downloaded the .zip file from the reverse beacon page and there are plenty of good spots for me th
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-10/msg00036.html (16,886 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu