Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Station\s+upgrade\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Station\s+upgrade\s*$/: 36 ]

Total 36 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] Station upgrade (score: 1): Author: IronmanY2k <IronmanY2K@triathlete.com>; Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 14:47:21 -0800 (PST); Hello fellow RTTY contesters. In order to help improve my scores I have made some upgrades to my station. You can find a pic of it at: http://www.contesting.com/data/profile/ad6wl/photo.jpeg If the U; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-01/msg00372.html (6,740 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] Station upgrade (score: 1): Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>; Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 15:05:03 -0800; http://www.contesting.com/data/profile/ad6wl/photo.jpeg What is that -third- Waterfall display for? I thought you only did SO2R. 73 Chen, W7AY _______________________________________________ RTTY mai; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-01/msg00373.html (6,978 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] Station upgrade (score: 1): Author: "WA9ALS - John" <ham_reflectors@wa9als.com>; Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 19:50:43 -0500; Cool call - AD6WriteLog _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-01/msg00380.html (6,872 bytes)
4. Re: [RTTY] Station upgrade (score: 1): Author: K4SB <k4sb@earthlink.net>; Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2004 02:40:09 +0000; Yep, shame the photo is not. Ed _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-01/msg00382.html (7,053 bytes)
5. Re: [RTTY] Station upgrade (score: 1): Author: WI8W <rtty@comcast.net>; Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2004 02:55:08 +0000; I wonder where the radios are? 73 Thom WI8W _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-01/msg00383.html (6,685 bytes)
6. [RTTY] Station upgrade (score: 1): Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>; Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 21:12:00 -0800; OK, here's the scoop. I have about $1000 to spend on a new toy. Right now I am running a TS-450SAT as my main radio and a FT-840 as the 2nd radio--no amp in the shack (sure miss it sometimes). What w; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00284.html (6,573 bytes)
7. Re: [RTTY] Station upgrade (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>; Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 03:55:56 -0800; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Traditional wisdom says the best bang for the buck is to spend it on the antenna. Assuming you have already done that, next would b; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00287.html (7,569 bytes)
8. Re: [RTTY] Station Upgrade (score: 1): Author: "Dick Kriss, AA5VU" <aa5vu@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 13:36:33 -0600; You did not say what kind of antenna system you are running. My 2-cent for the best bang for the buck would be 1. Antenna system 2. Amplifier. I don't understand why anyone would run QRP. For most RT; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00288.html (8,018 bytes)
9. Re: [RTTY] Station upgrade (score: 1): Author: "Doug Hall" <k4dsp.doug@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 15:44:37 -0500; I agree about the antenna. And if you can buy an Alpha then more power to ya. Literally. But for $500 you can buy a Heathkit SB-220. Like many older amps it comes from the days when power was rated i; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00289.html (9,649 bytes)
10. Re: [RTTY] Station upgrade (score: 1): Author: "Stephen J Carroll" <scarroll@mchsi.com>; Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 14:46:48 -0600; Tom, If it were me, I'd do one of the following... tower, or improving the feedline... a few DB here or there goes a L-O-N-G way and then you wouldn't need an amplifier !!!) filters My 2 cents... 73,; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00290.html (7,206 bytes)
11. [RTTY] Station upgrade (score: 1): Author: "Robert Chudek" <k0rc@citlink.net>; Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 15:57:26 -0600; Tom, Let's see... you mentioned you really missed the AMP twice... and you really liked your '450 once... I would suggest you could do both within your budget... That is, upgrade your FT-840 to anoth; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00291.html (8,638 bytes)
12. Re: [RTTY] Station upgrade (score: 1): Author: "Tyler Stewart" <k3mm@verizon.net>; Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2006 20:05:35 -0500; I don't know about the FT840, but the TS4x0 is really a lousy contest radio. The worst part is the noisy synthesizer, and if you overdrive in AFSK...gawd! Instead of running high power, get a couple; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00324.html (9,697 bytes)
13. Re: [RTTY] Station upgrade (score: 1): Author: "Bill Turner" <dezrat@copper.net>; Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2006 18:02:04 -0800; ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Or '870s. I've owned both and the '870 has much better IF bandpass shape due to the digital filter. 73, Bill W6WRT ___________________________________________; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00325.html (7,287 bytes)
14. Re: [RTTY] Station upgrade (score: 1): Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2006 22:50:11 -0500; I bet you can get Don AA5AU to sell you one. Don't think he's using his right now. 73 - Jim AD1C -- Jim Reisert AD1C, 7 Charlemont Court, North Chelmsford, MA 01863 USA +978-251-9933, <jjreisert@alum; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00326.html (7,204 bytes)
15. Re: [RTTY] Station upgrade (score: 1): Author: "AD5VJ Bob" <rtnmi@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2006 22:03:40 -0600; I fellows relatively new mode for me. What do you guys consider the best brand/model radio for RTTY barring cost factor? 73 fer nw, Bob AD5VJ 10X# 37210, FP#-1141, SMIRK#-5177 http://www.n5iet.com/ C; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00327.html (8,698 bytes)
16. Re: [RTTY] Station upgrade (score: 1): Author: "Bill Turner" <dezrat@copper.net>; Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2006 20:13:53 -0800; ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Of all the ones I've used, I like the IC-746PRO the best. It has a RTTY filter mode which provides a twin peak filter, 300 Hz bandwidth and amplitude limiting; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00328.html (8,341 bytes)
17. Re: [RTTY] Station upgrade (score: 1): Author: "Robert Chudek" <k0rc@citlink.net>; Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2006 22:16:06 -0600; Okay, a second shot at this... I agree, the TS-850SAT is definitely a better radio. They're selling in the $700 ~ $800 price range for a sharp used unit. Then you can filter them up for another coupl; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00329.html (9,105 bytes)
18. Re: [RTTY] Station upgrade (score: 1): Author: "Bill Turner" <dezrat@copper.net>; Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2006 20:21:06 -0800; ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Microphone? I thought those went out with CW. :-) 73, Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00330.html (7,647 bytes)
19. Re: [RTTY] Station upgrade (score: 1): Author: "AD5VJ Bob" <rtnmi@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2006 23:22:29 -0600; So 250hz is the filter size I want to use for RTTY? 73 fer nw, Bob AD5VJ 10X# 37210, FP#-1141, SMIRK#-5177 http://www.n5iet.com/ Code may be taking a back seat for now, but the pioneering spirit that; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00331.html (8,775 bytes)
20. Re: [RTTY] Station upgrade (score: 1): Author: "Bill Turner" <dezrat@copper.net>; Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2006 22:25:31 -0800; ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Yes, either 250 or 300 will do fine. 500 will do in a pinch (stranded on a desert island) but you wouldn't be happy with it in a contest. Ragchewing or DXing,; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00332.html (8,149 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]