- 1. [RTTY] Suggested RM-11708 Letter Needed (score: 1)
- Author: paul ecker <eckerpw@yahoo.com>
- Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 13:08:38 -0700 (PDT)
- Message: 6 Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 14:57:16 -0500 From: "Jeff AC0C" <keepwalking188@ac0c.com> To: "paul ecker" <eckerpw@yahoo.com>, <rtty@contesting.com> Subject: Re: [RTTY] Message-ID: <9A0D1B3678
- /archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00136.html (7,764 bytes)
- 2. Re: [RTTY] Suggested RM-11708 Letter Needed (score: 1)
- Author: "Ron Kolarik" <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>
- Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 16:45:12 -0500
- Paul the FCC and ARRL are different critters than legislators. There was a recent RM from the ARRL that got flooded with form responses and when it was pointed out to the commission they were not rea
- /archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00139.html (8,759 bytes)
- 3. Re: [RTTY] Suggested RM-11708 Letter Needed (score: 1)
- Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
- Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 19:19:02 -0400
- True - the Commission and legislators are different animals. However, "talking points" for those interested in filing comments against RM-11708 cant hurt. Here is a start: 1) there is no overwhelming
- /archives//html/RTTY/2014-04/msg00141.html (13,364 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu