Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Suggestion\s+for\s+upcoming\s+RTTY\s+Roundup\s*$/: 21 ]

Total 21 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] Suggestion for upcoming RTTY Roundup (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 07:58:46 -0500
Dick Thompson wrote: "I would like to put forth a suggestion to those who are entering the ARRL RTTY Contest, especially the newer people. The report that you send is a signal report & State or Provi
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-12/msg00341.html (7,933 bytes)

2. Re: [RTTY] Suggestion for upcoming RTTY Roundup (score: 1)
Author: "robert" <tf3rb@internet.is>
Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 16:19:43 -0000
Hi I hope that everyone send a DE before there callsign and a 599 before the exchange. All the programs I have seen needs those two worde so they know that a callsign is comming and a exchange. If th
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-12/msg00343.html (10,249 bytes)

3. Re: [RTTY] Suggestion for upcoming RTTY Roundup (score: 1)
Author: Andrei Nevis <v49a@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 09:55:48 -0800 (PST)
Hi Robert and All: Yes, I agree, please do Not send "dashes" between anything, 599 05 is quite enough. Robert, again congratulations on your New Callsign - TF3TTY looks darn good, Happy New Year, you
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-12/msg00345.html (10,940 bytes)

4. Re: [RTTY] Suggestion for upcoming RTTY Roundup (score: 1)
Author: "Terry Gerdes" <terry@ab5k.net>
Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 12:06:17 -0600
For the upcoming ARRL RTTY Roundup the exchange is your state as in 599 TX. You can always get great message examples at http://rttycontesting.com/ 73 Terry - AB5K __________________________________
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-12/msg00346.html (12,810 bytes)

5. Re: [RTTY] Suggestion for upcoming RTTY Roundup (score: 1)
Author: "robert" <tf3rb@internet.is>
Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 20:34:23 -0000
hi Tyler. All true. if we are talking about being fast or speed. Then I would be very happy too see something on the reflector to speed things up. When I have to sit and watch all these ham's calling
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-12/msg00356.html (14,369 bytes)

6. Re: [RTTY] Suggestion for upcoming RTTY Roundup (score: 1)
Author: "Tyler Stewart" <k3mm@verizon.net>
Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 15:15:16 -0500
For slower paced contests that may be fine, but unless you send a new shift character before each character group, many of us will unshift. If you do it properly by at least shifting (let alone unshi
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-12/msg00357.html (12,345 bytes)

7. Re: [RTTY] Suggestion for upcoming RTTY Roundup (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>
Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 12:55:28 -0800
Once you have unshifted, unless you send a figures shift character, you will be getting the "too etu too etu" characters, then you have to look at the keyboard and figure what the heck number "etu" i
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-12/msg00358.html (13,475 bytes)

8. Re: [RTTY] Suggestion for upcoming RTTY Roundup (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 13:00:49 -0800
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ It's not a question of smart or dumb decoders, it's an inherent issue with Unshift On Space (USOS). What you are doing by sending d
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-12/msg00359.html (10,144 bytes)

9. Re: [RTTY] Suggestion for upcoming RTTY Roundup (score: 1)
Author: "robert" <tf3rb@internet.is>
Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 21:04:57 -0000
I did see that when I was using writelog and mmty programs, But never when using rckrtty. if a report is TOO it's converted to 599 and thes is as it should be. I was in a qso with a station's in euro
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-12/msg00360.html (16,096 bytes)

10. Re: [RTTY] Suggestion for upcoming RTTY Roundup (score: 1)
Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>
Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 13:06:50 -0800
Hmmm, perhaps sending "5NN OR OR" instead of "599 OR OR" is not such a bad idea after all !! HI HI UE and Happy New Year. See y'all in the Roundup. I will be operating W9OL-style (single op, don't ca
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-12/msg00361.html (8,909 bytes)

11. Re: [RTTY] Suggestion for upcoming RTTY Roundup (score: 1)
Author: "robert" <tf3rb@internet.is>
Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 21:10:35 -0000
Hi Bill. I did read about it long time ago but I forgot it. I guess it's because I never think about it any moore. I have seen this dashes in many rtty programs as a default and always removed the da
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-12/msg00362.html (11,383 bytes)

12. Re: [RTTY] Suggestion for upcoming RTTY Roundup (score: 1)
Author: "WW3S" <ww3s@zoominternet.net>
Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 16:51:29 -0500
it depends on what the exchange is.....for Roundup, you are correct. It would be best to NOT send the dash. In contests where the exchange is a number, however, you are better off to send 599-05-05 o
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-12/msg00366.html (9,549 bytes)

13. Re: [RTTY] Suggestion for upcoming RTTY Roundup (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 15:06:22 -0800
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Even better would be FNN OR OR. :-) 73, Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contestin
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-12/msg00369.html (9,060 bytes)

14. Re: [RTTY] Suggestion for upcoming RTTY Roundup (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 15:12:48 -0800
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ I disagree. With no spaces, you lose the advantage of USOS, even with all numbers. If the FIGS shift character gets munged at the s
/archives//html/RTTY/2005-12/msg00370.html (8,963 bytes)

15. Re: [RTTY] Suggestion for upcoming RTTY Roundup (score: 1)
Author: "Tyler Stewart" <k3mm@verizon.net>
Date: Sun, 01 Jan 2006 15:38:08 -0500
Oh, good point! Yes, definitely if you are separating say the 599 from the QTH or something else that contains letters, use a space or even a new line if conditions are tough. I was only thinking abo
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00010.html (9,441 bytes)

16. Re: [RTTY] Suggestion for upcoming RTTY Roundup (score: 1)
Author: "Tyler Stewart" <k3mm@verizon.net>
Date: Sun, 01 Jan 2006 15:44:29 -0500
Wouldn't it be: TOOAPTAPTAPT ? (The dash is a shifted A if I remember correctly) Most of us recognize the correct numbers in this case are the ones directly above the letter keys for what appears on
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00011.html (8,289 bytes)

17. Re: [RTTY] Suggestion for upcoming RTTY Roundup (score: 1)
Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Sun, 01 Jan 2006 16:45:02 -0500
In fact, I will usually send: 599-05 05 The best of both worlds! 73 - Jim AD1C -- Jim Reisert AD1C, 7 Charlemont Court, North Chelmsford, MA 01863 USA +978-251-9933, <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>, http://
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00014.html (7,448 bytes)

18. Re: [RTTY] Suggestion for upcoming RTTY Roundup (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Sun, 01 Jan 2006 14:16:27 -0800
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Correct. A long time ago someone commented that the dash was present in both LTRS and FIGS case and I assumed that to be true. Not
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00015.html (8,305 bytes)

19. Re: [RTTY] Suggestion for upcoming RTTY Roundup (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Sun, 01 Jan 2006 14:22:15 -0800
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ That depends on what you mean by "better". If you mean faster sending, you are correct. If you mean more likely to get through, not
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00017.html (8,371 bytes)

20. Re: [RTTY] Suggestion for upcoming RTTY Roundup (score: 1)
Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>
Date: Sun, 1 Jan 2006 14:24:57 -0800
Just like I usually send DE W7AY W7AY to keep the programs that need "DE" happy. 73 Chen _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.
/archives//html/RTTY/2006-01/msg00018.html (7,490 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu