Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Symbol\s+Rate\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Symbol\s+Rate\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] Symbol Rate (score: 1): Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@frontier.com>; Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 20:04:45 -0800; I saw this in the ARRL letter tonight: " The League took steps to clarify just what it is -- and is not -- asking the FCC to do. ARRL General Counsel Chris Imlay, W3KD, said that while a significant; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-12/msg00132.html (7,489 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] Symbol Rate (score: 1): Author: "Jeff Blaine" <keepwalking188@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 22:44:59 -0600; Yea, SSB ops are out of the woods. No risk there. This is the big change in the 2005-2007 filing vs. now. And they are right, it's not a LARGE scale plan - rather, it's incremental and small steps to; /archives//html/RTTY/2013-12/msg00133.html (8,738 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]