- 1. [RTTY] Thanks for the Q's (score: 1)
- Author: Steve NR4M <steve@nr4m.com>
- Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 15:32:22 +0000
- Everyone, I want to thank everyone for the Q's this past weekend, and especially their patience. We had a full crew, but about 1/3 had ZERO, or very limited RTTY experience, and no contesting experie
- /archives//html/RTTY/2014-02/msg00203.html (6,689 bytes)
- 2. [RTTY] Thanks for the Q's (score: 1)
- Author: "Tom Magarelli" <wa2pni@verizon.net>
- Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 11:09:27 -0500
- Steve, My thoughts are: I just checked my log and I was given contact # 907 So your team had to really be doing a fantastic job. I'm sure everybody in this group HAD to have a first contest. Mine was
- /archives//html/RTTY/2014-02/msg00204.html (7,231 bytes)
- 3. Re: [RTTY] Thanks for the Q's (score: 1)
- Author: Al Kozakiewicz <akozak@hourglass.com>
- Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 12:08:09 -0500
- Heh, heh, heh....methinks you are seriously underestimating people! My big laugh for the weekend came late Sunday afternoon. I came across a huge pileup. A VE5 (VE5MX, I think, don't remember offhan
- /archives//html/RTTY/2014-02/msg00205.html (7,476 bytes)
- 4. Re: [RTTY] Thanks for the Q's (score: 1)
- Author: "John GW4SKA" <ska@bartg.org.uk>
- Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 12:49:31 -0500
- Steve, Thanks for all the contacts in the test. No need to worry about the new ops ... I thought you were all rubbish :-) Cheers, John GW4SKA Everyone, I want to thank everyone for the Q's this past
- /archives//html/RTTY/2014-02/msg00206.html (8,570 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu